Skip to comments.
New rhetoric in SCOTUS abortion ruling (Ginsgerg: Stop calling a 2nd trimester "fetus" a "baby")
Associated Press ^
| 04/19/07
| PETE YOST
Posted on 04/19/2007 9:56:32 AM PDT by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-139 next last
To: IL Republican
She is, in most states in the US. The fact that Scott Peterson was charged with the murder of his unborn son was essentially unprecedented.
We tried to pass a law to fix that here in New Hampshire a couple of years ago, but the pro-abortion crowd screamed that it was a “slippery slope.”
61
posted on
04/19/2007 10:43:16 AM PDT
by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: IL Republican
Who is right? You are. Illinois: The killing of an "unborn child" at any stage of pre-natal development is intentional homicide, voluntary manslaughter, or involuntary manslaughter or reckless homicide. Ill. Comp. Stat. ch. 720, ''5/9-1.2, 5/9-2.1, 5/9-3.2 (1993).
Should preface that law by saying: The killing of an "unborn child" at any stage of pre-natal development (outside of an abortion clinic) is intentional homicide, voluntary manslaughter, or involuntary manslaughter or reckless homicide.
As an aside, when my sister-in-law was eight months pregnant with twins, she was hospitalized with high blood pressure. Every time I went to visit her, the doctor always reffered to "the fetus" instead of "the baby." It really creeped me out.
62
posted on
04/19/2007 10:44:54 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(Suspended for posting an article about Scalia and Arthur Miller arguing at SCOTUS. Seriously.)
To: pennboricua
Damn know-it-alls... thinking Clark Kent is Superman! I mean, come on!
63
posted on
04/19/2007 10:45:51 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(Suspended for posting an article about Scalia and Arthur Miller arguing at SCOTUS. Seriously.)
To: Cicero
Abortion Rights Activists prefer more scientific terms? Remember the Penn and Teller scam last week where they got Environmental Activists to sign a petition to ban Di-Hydrogen Monoxide?
64
posted on
04/19/2007 10:45:57 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: mvpel
Shucks, I hate admitting that I’m wrong.
To: IL Republican
Wait, I may be behind the times here...
Yes, I am a bit - Bush signed the Unborn Victims of Violence Act in 2004. But that only applies to crimes having federal jurisdiction. According to the Wikipedia article (I know, I know...) 34 states have similar laws for state-jurisdiction crimes.
66
posted on
04/19/2007 10:48:29 AM PDT
by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: devolve
This is just too funny, but frightening also. Every time I see this bitch getting wound up, it reminds me of Hitler, at one of his mass rallies.
Besides Adolf’s bulging eyes, she has the same manic obsession with power and lack of conscience. If she had to murder 6 million Jews to rule the world, no problem. Don’t forget, when it comes to a sociopath, the end always justifies the means.
To: massgopguy
Penn Jillette is best left to another thread. He is rabidly pro-abortion.
68
posted on
04/19/2007 10:49:19 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(Suspended for posting an article about Scalia and Arthur Miller arguing at SCOTUS. Seriously.)
To: presidio9
She may be a lawyer but she has no clue about medicine and especially pregnancy. This slug is clueless and unable to understand reality.
69
posted on
04/19/2007 10:49:59 AM PDT
by
lawdude
(The First Amendment is there so we CAN offend people with our words.)
To: taxesareforever
To the fast approaching non-viable Ruthie Ginsberg, the debate is about not exposing the dehumanizing rhetoric her allies in evil have promoted. She, like all liberal pukes, cannot stand truth to invade the mountain of lies upon which her world view rests ... she is the exhibiting the ‘zeitgeist’ of liberalism, shape the debate by capturing the language and spit upon any who would shine truth to ‘power’, the power of evil to twist and lie for empowerment.
70
posted on
04/19/2007 10:50:22 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(You've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
To: presidio9
Thank you, I’m glad to see that my very liberal state got one thing right!
To: AntiGuv
Looks like she just bit the head off a Bat!
72
posted on
04/19/2007 10:52:00 AM PDT
by
lawdude
(The First Amendment is there so we CAN offend people with our words.)
To: IamConservative
The way this is worded by the majority seems to imply there is a right/approved way of killing a fetus. Coulter is right, it's a religous sacrifice. {Someone please help with the pictures}
73
posted on
04/19/2007 10:53:33 AM PDT
by
fella
(Respect does not equal fear unless your a tyrant.)
To: Dan(9698)
The truth will set us free! It’s like some people in this country are under some kind of evil spell and would kill for the right to an abortion.
74
posted on
04/19/2007 10:57:00 AM PDT
by
red irish
(Gods Children in the womb are to be loved too!)
To: presidio9
Ruth Bader is only the tip of the Ginsberg. Thank God that five members of the court recognized the murderous, lethal bulk of the Ginsberg below the skinny, harmless looking tip.
75
posted on
04/19/2007 10:58:44 AM PDT
by
F.J. Mitchell
(Well armed intended victims will leave little DNA to identify the perp. But that's as it should be.)
To: IL Republican
76
posted on
04/19/2007 11:00:40 AM PDT
by
red irish
(Gods Children in the womb are to be loved too!)
To: presidio9
Hell... fetus isn’t even specific, it’s a generic term used mainly for mammals in the womb. So what specifically is it they are aborting? They’ve already established “it” is alive. Could it possibly be a human being? Gasp! It’s a baby human!
JW
77
posted on
04/19/2007 11:01:42 AM PDT
by
JWinNC
(www.anailinhisplace.net)
To: presidio9
You should have corrected the doctor!
78
posted on
04/19/2007 11:01:59 AM PDT
by
red irish
(Gods Children in the womb are to be loved too!)
To: potlatch; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; MeekOneGOP; dixiechick2000; Grampa Dave; Interesting Times; ...
79
posted on
04/19/2007 11:04:21 AM PDT
by
devolve
( ........upload images free & fast at tinypic.com or Photobucket or Imagecave)
To: presidio9
;-) Anyone caught changing clothes in a telephone booth should be charged with indecent exposure! Except for Super Girl.
80
posted on
04/19/2007 11:08:26 AM PDT
by
F.J. Mitchell
(Well armed intended victims will leave little DNA to identify the perp. But that is as it should be.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-139 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson