Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: abb
"The continued troubles in the housing market lowered demand for real estate ads in the quarter. The year-ago period also was bolstered by ads related to the Olympics and political spots ahead of the national elections." BS!
4 posted on 04/19/2007 7:40:29 AM PDT by henkster (Al Gore is the second coming...of Trofim Lysenko)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: henkster
"The continued troubles in the housing market lowered demand for real estate ads in the quarter. The year-ago period also was bolstered by ads related to the Olympics and political spots ahead of the national elections." BS!

You are ABSOLUTELY dead-on. The quote is a load of bull SPECIFICALLY the supposed Real Estate ad downturn. Of all the advertisers whose knee-jerk reaction during a "downturn" is to cut ad spending, Real Estate agents and agencies actually crank up the adspending when things are not turning over as fast as they would like them to. Think about it....if the total market inventory is in surplus (compared to a few years ago)because properties are not moving as fast, Agents and agencies have more to show and NEED to get as much printspace as they can to compete and show all they are offering. The howler is that of ALL the professions save show business, Real Estate is more like a Personality Cult than any other single business sector. A third or MORE of the Real Estate ads feature JUST the Real Estate agents. These "Vanity" ads are on the Upswing! Granted, they do actually serve a purpose since more than a few prospective home sellers may be swayed by the Vanity ads when they choose a firm/person to represent them in their sale.

It is a TOTAL Newspaper adspace demand downturn you are seeing. Ad Buyers have had to get smarter (read "FRUGAL") in buying Newspaper adspace because instead of attracting more business by lowering page rates, the newspapers have RAISED rates to keep profits up. What sense does it make to be paying MORE to advertise in a medium that reaches less and less people?

To top that, they are claiming that due to the election cycle,they can't count on boosted revenue due to political ads? And this is something new? Really, now. The bulk of that money goes to TV anyway.

9 posted on 04/19/2007 11:37:04 AM PDT by Range Rover (Remember kids, Lawn Darts are ILLEGAL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson