Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT

Okay, I am good with that.

Personally, my attitude is that I will be tolerant to a degree and will make multiple attempts to remain on a civil footing in my discourse, but when confronted by incivility that cannot be remedied by logic and persuasion, other means (including reciprocal incivility) may be forthcoming, depending on the situation.

If I can walk away, I will. But if it means I must cede the platform of discourse to an uncivil person or someone with destructive intent in discussing an important issue, I refuse to do so.


15 posted on 04/19/2007 9:29:59 AM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel

It’s hard responding to uncivil people in a civilized manner.

But most of the time it’s not a debate, and it’s simply a matter of choice.

It’s funnny today listening to Rush say he’s not promoting incivility, in the same breath as he calls Senator Harry Reid “Dingy Harry” and regularly says Ted “The Swimmer” Kennedy.

He says I don’t get humor. But I do. I see these are funny, and I laugh. But it’s laughter at the expense of civility.


16 posted on 04/19/2007 9:37:27 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson