Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexican Archeologists Discover Evidence of Child Sacrifice
Cnews ^ | 4/18/2007 | Cnews

Posted on 04/18/2007 6:52:55 PM PDT by Dallas59

MEXICO CITY (AP) - Archeologists have discovered the remains of two dozen children in Mexico apparently sacrificed by priests who slashed their throats and offered their blood to the rain god Tlaloc, researchers said Tuesday.

The discovery at a former Toltec settlement indicates child sacrifice predated the Aztecs, an advanced civilization conquered by the Spain in the 16th century and was fairly commonplace.

Dating to about AD 950 to 1150, the bones of the children were found on the outskirts of the Toltec archeological zone Tula, said Luis Gamboa, an archeologist for the National Institute of Anthropology and History. The sacrificed children ranged from age five to about 15.

"They had some incisions on the vertebrae that suggested they had used some sort of (stone) to cut their throats, not so much to cut off their heads but rather, it appears, to cut the jugular and bleed them to death," Gamboa said.

The bodies were all found in a single four-metre-square pit in excavations that began in early March on the grounds of a police station just outside the archeological site, about 70 kilometres north of Mexico City.

All were laid out in the same position - facing east - around a shrine to Tlaloc, leading archeologists to believe "this was something collective, done simultaneously," in a single ritual, Gamboa said.

"It was one of the many neighbourhoods on the outskirts of the ceremonial centre and what we found was part of daily life," Gamboa said.

Accounts written by Spanish priests soon after the 1521 conquest indicated the Aztecs sacrificed children and archeologists have found the remains of some Aztec child victims. The Toltecs are believed to have dominated central Mexico between the 10th and 12th centuries, before the Aztecs rose to prominence.

The Aztecs believed sacrificed children would become the servants of Tlaloc and bring more rain, said archeologist Victor Arribalzaga, who is excavating a temple to Tlaloc on a mountain on the eastern outskirts of Mexico City.

Children who cried a lot were especially selected as sacrifice victims, as were those that bore the "sign" of Tlaloc: a double crown in their hair.

"The priests entered a pit, which we have located, and they sacrificed the children," he said, quoting a 16th-century Spanish account written about events at the temple.

"Then the priest came out with the blood of the children and smeared it on the idols and then on the rulers and then on the people at large," Arribalzaga said.

"It was like when a priest scatters holy water."

While Arribalzaga has yet to find remains of the victims at the temple site, he said he expects to do so when excavations expand.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Mexico
KEYWORDS: 1492; ageofcolonization; aztec; conquistadors; humansacrifice; mexico; newworld
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: org.whodat
I know. Maybe I should have said: "Kinda makes Cortez look slightly better." No telling how many the Aztecs slaughtered. Neither the Spanyards nor the Aztecs gets a Good Conduct Medal.

There's a frieze--Mayan or Aztec, I can't remember--showing men carrying children, apparantly to sacrifice them. At least this is how it looks to me. Some interpreted it as men carrying dwarves. This doesn't hold water to me. It looks like frightened children.

In one of the Yucatan cities--Merida?--at the public square, there's a frieze showing the Spanish conquistadors standing on the heads of subjugated Indians. I was told that the Spanish forced the Indians to carve it.

Humans have been capable of hideous atrocities all throughout history.

There is much to be said for the hope that we will evolve into people of greater enlightenment. It is a worthy thing for which to pray and to work hard on ourselves. Ruthless honesty helps.

It also helps to keep reminding ourselves that heroism and goodness are as profound a part of human nature as are cruelty, oppression, and evil--probably more profound.

It may be a hard call, but the vast majority of people on earth today seem to be good people, especially when their basic needs are met and they are not subjected to fear or injustice. This has been my impression as I have travelled across the world.

41 posted on 04/19/2007 7:00:53 AM PDT by Savage Beast (Marxism works only in the minds of sociopaths and morons. The Democrat Party is the S&M Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez
Post #3: Christians of the Middle Ages similarly perverted religion. What could be more perverse than to interpret the teachings of Jesus Christ as a command to torture and kill--and what couuld be a greater blasphemy?

Muslims who interpret the will of God as a command to murder, torture, rape, enslave, and blow up innocent people commit equally hideous perversions of God's will and equally ignominious blasphemy.

I am a profoundly religious man; however, anyone who will can clearly see the evil that can easily reult from the perversion of religion and the perverse interpretation of God's will.

42 posted on 04/19/2007 7:20:49 AM PDT by Savage Beast (Marxism works only in the minds of sociopaths and morons. The Democrat Party is the S&M Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: driftless2

The Spanish were both bloody and very anti-modern (and soon in decline as a power despite the silver and gold of Bolivia, Mexico and Peru).

There had been civilization in the Valley of Mexico for a long time when the Spanish arrived.


43 posted on 04/19/2007 7:22:06 AM PDT by nomeansno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

The Spanish policy was that everyone under Spanish rule would be Catholic on pain of death without exception, whether they liked it or not.

The Muslims who ruled Spain were infinitely more tolerant than their Christian successors.


44 posted on 04/19/2007 7:25:03 AM PDT by nomeansno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: nomeansno

The Spaniards were responsible for introducing European customs, “anti-modern” or not into a primitive world. Did the Aztecs sail across the ocean or did the Spaniards do it? Whatever their faults, the Spaniards were certainly preferable to the Aztecs.


45 posted on 04/19/2007 7:26:52 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Oceans99
Are you aware that

Are you aware that I'm probably better educated than you? I've read dozens of books on the Butchery of Cortez and he and the catholic church and Spain sealing all these people's gold. Tell the catholic church to give the money back and I'll re consider. Human sacrifice was practiced all over the know world before cortez, at one place are the other at different times in history, but I don't remember two many mass slaughters over it. Except for the ones written about in the old testament.

46 posted on 04/19/2007 7:35:02 AM PDT by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
I've read dozens of books on the Butchery of Cortez and he and the catholic church and Spain sealing all these people's gold.

Better educated? I think not. That was poor sentence structure.

...but I don't remember two many mass slaughters over it.

That would be TOO, dear. My thirteen year old daughter writes better grammar.

47 posted on 04/19/2007 7:44:29 AM PDT by Alkhin (star dust contemplating star dust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
Personally of the opinion that Spanish and Portuguese subjugation by the Muslim Moors for around half a millennium caused for some Islamic traits to rub off on them--chiefly the violence. Notably, the English and particularly the French (also Roman Catholics) didn't pressure the surrounding natives in their parts of the New World to adopt Christianity, although they were proselytized to.

I am of this opinion as well.

48 posted on 04/19/2007 7:48:15 AM PDT by Alkhin (star dust contemplating star dust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: fabian

Christianize Mexico? Bulls**t. That only came later. Think mercenary.


49 posted on 04/19/2007 7:53:30 AM PDT by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: nomeansno

you are reading some pretty twisted history...I have almost finished “History of the Conquest of Mexico” by William H. Prescott which is available at the bookstores. He wrote largely from manuscripts taken from people who were there...including the spanish clergy that accompanied Cortes. The author is not totaly pro spannish but paints a very detailed and acknowledged by many historians, accurate picture of the true history. Father Olmed was close to Cortes and he was the main man who spoke through an interpeter to bring the forgiveness truth to the Mexicans and indian tribes. The killing after the battles happened to be done by the very brutal Aztec warriors and priests. All of the captured allies and spaniards were marched up the pyramids and their hearts were ripped out of their bodies while they were alive. In contrast, Cortes offered peaceful terms at every possible opportunity and was responsible for making the people’s lives so much better after the war. The Aztecs were known for conquering and subjegating the native people and murdering them wholesale for their evil religion. Take a look at the book, there is so much politically correct nonsense taught about Cortes.


50 posted on 04/19/2007 9:09:28 AM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: anglian

not at all buloney...check out “history of the conquest of mexico” by Prescott. He was not all pro- spanish and deatails so much, written largely from manuscripts of people who were actually there. The odds of victory for Cortes and his about 900 men seemed overwhelming to many of them. And the Aztecs fought like maniacs...it was much beyond the idea of gold that motivated the conquest. Simply read his own writings...he wasn’t lieing and no amount of wealth would have made him persevere as he did at great lose to both sides; which by the way, he tried to mitigate and make peace at every opportunity. But when he demanded that their human sacrifice religion must be replaced with forgiving christianity the Aztec priests and people went nuts and refused.


52 posted on 04/19/2007 9:24:03 AM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Oceans99

Converted them just in time for the Spanish Inquisition.


53 posted on 04/19/2007 10:23:59 AM PDT by art_rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Oceans99

“’Butchered’ thousands and thousands? LOL. Are you aware that as Cortez marched towards the Aztec capital he only had 400 men with him? Are you aware that Cortez was joined by thousands of local Indians who hated the Aztecs because they had been conquered and oppressed by them? Are you aware that the Aztecs were not only a child-killing people, but a brutal people of conquest who vanquished every other native tribe who stood in their way? Cortez and his 400 men conquered the great Aztec nation because the bitter enemies of the Aztecs fought with them. “

Then those Indian tribes that helped Cortez found out their treatment under the Spandiards was worse then under the Aztecs.


54 posted on 04/19/2007 10:26:29 AM PDT by art_rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: fabian

“But when he demanded that their human sacrifice religion must be replaced with forgiving christianity the Aztec priests and people went nuts and refused.”

What would you do if you were told to give up your religion? Give it up peacefully or fight? You and I both disagree with their practice of human sacrifice, but they saw it as a natural part of their life and were willing to die for it.


55 posted on 04/19/2007 10:41:18 AM PDT by art_rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
Actually most of the letters we use on FR are the medieval manuscript version (Caroline minuscule) rather than forms the Romans would have used.

I wasn't saying I think the Mayan glyphs are from Carthaginian writing, but that one of the first Europeans to see them made the connection. The person in question was one Vinko Paletin, discussed in David Lupher's book Romans in a New World (University of Michigan Press, 2003), a Dalmatian who wound up serving in the Spanish army which invaded that area before eventually becoming a Dominican friar (Fray Vicente Palatino de Curzola).

The Greek alphabet derives from the Phoenician alphabet (the Greeks remembered this and referred to them as "Phoenician letters") but "phonics" comes from the Greek word phone meaning "sound" (especially the sound of the human voice) or "the faculty of speech."

56 posted on 04/19/2007 11:01:37 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
America sacrifices babies more than a million a year.. yearly..
Those primitive tribes probably didn't do that many..
57 posted on 04/19/2007 11:10:57 AM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alkhin
I don’t recall anyone addressing you Pinocchio noise./p>
58 posted on 04/19/2007 1:00:12 PM PDT by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: art_rocks
"Converted them just in time for the Spanish Inquisition."

Ah yes, after centuries of suffering under Islamic conquest and oppression that great institution called the 'Spanish Inquisition' was designed by the King and Queen of Spain to expose and rid themselves of the leftover Muslims, (and their allies), who had falsely converted and remained in Spain as subversives and spies. It also exposed many Jews who had fought alongside the Moslems in North Africa to help defeat the Spaniards. Spain suffered what modern day Europe is now suffering, they were infested with deadly muslims, but they knew how to deal with it. I regret that Europe and the U.S. don't have the brains and guts that the King and Queen of Spain had.

59 posted on 04/19/2007 4:16:06 PM PDT by Oceans99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Oceans99

Praising the Spanish Inquisition is not very different from praising the Holocaust. Disgusting.

Do you know what the term “auto de fe” means? If the U.S. ever has the “guts” of the kings and queens of Spain, they should start with you.


60 posted on 04/19/2007 4:54:51 PM PDT by nomeansno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson