Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wolfowitz deputy urges him to quit
The Financial Times ^ | 18 April 2007 | Krishna Guha and Eoin Callan

Posted on 04/18/2007 6:23:21 PM PDT by Kitten Festival

One of Paul Wolfowitz’s two deputies on Wednesday urged the World Bank president to resign as the civil war inside the institution reached top management.

Graeme Wheeler, managing director, made his call in front of all the bank’s top officials at an extraordinary session of their regular weekly meeting.

It is understood that other top managers of vice-president rank also suggested Mr Wolfowitz should go.

But Mr Wolfowitz – who has been under growing pressure following revelations that he was personally involved in securing a big pay rise as part of a secondment package to the US state department for his girlfriend Shaha Riza – told the meeting he had no intention of quitting.

Asked whether he denied that Mr Wheeler had told Mr Wolfowitz to resign, Marwan Muasher, vice-president for external affairs, said: “I do not comment on private meetings inside the bank.”

Within hours of Mr Wheeler’s call for Mr Wolfowitz to go in the interests of the bank, its regional teams of managers were taking sides.

Those from the bank’s Latin America region expressed strong support for Mr Wheeler’s position and agreed to threaten to resign en mass if Mr Wolfowitz stayed. The East Asia and South Asia management teams also appeared to side with Mr Wheeler and against Mr Wolfowitz.

Meanwhile, the Africa and Middle East managers looked to be siding with Mr Wolfowitz.

The fissure that has opened at the top of the bank mirrors a gaping divide throughout the institution between Wolfowitz loyalists and the majority of officials who were there under his predecessor, Jim Wolfensohn.

The regions leaning in favour of Mr Wolfowitz are headed by officials appointed to vice-president rank by him; the regions leaning against him are headed by vice-presidents from the Wolfensohn bank.

(Excerpt) Read more at ft.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: corruption; scandal; wolfowitz; worldbank
The Latin Americans and the Far Easterners are urging him to quit. The Muslims of the Middle East and the Africans, both of whose coffers have been larded well by Wolfowitz, are asking him to stay. Ducky.
1 posted on 04/18/2007 6:23:23 PM PDT by Kitten Festival
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kitten Festival

Follow the money...


2 posted on 04/18/2007 6:30:29 PM PDT by Eyes Unclouded (We won't ever free our guns but be sure we'll let them triggers go....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kitten Festival
..."Ducky," eh? Someone else who said that a lot latched onto me a few years ago. :-) Wolfowitz didn't follow the accepted corporate/political path for keeping concubines. He should have collected the extra revenues for paying her off by various other means, then paid the "child support" and/or other moneys to her in other ways ("cash to spare chicks fund" or something like that). He should have taken lessons from our other moguls/preachers/politicians before playing.


3 posted on 04/18/2007 6:30:33 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons (has-been))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

She is not his concubine. She is a well-respected professional with 20 years service at the Bank at the time Wolfowitz was appointed its President. But if you want to make judgments based on lies be my guest. If you don’t you can check FR for editorials from the WSJ and articles by people like Chris Hitchens on this topic. The phony baloney story was begun by the Financial Times and has been well-debunked with the release this weekend of all the relevant documents—hyperlinked on a piece by Fox also posted here.


4 posted on 04/18/2007 6:39:48 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: familyop

The cites I referred to are in this article. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1818554/posts


5 posted on 04/18/2007 6:41:09 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

My comment was about the hypocrisies of the media and media consumers who suck them up. Consider occurrences like that of Murdoch (Fox News). Most of the politicians and businessmen I’ve met had quite a few wives each and paid them off to according to our contemporary romanesque system to legitimize their actions. One State assemblyman had eight wives and a multitude of kids.

But if Riza and Wolfowitz didn’t have sex and the alleged pay raise wasn’t about that, then they stand morally above most. I’m not doubting that as the situation, given your correction.


6 posted on 04/18/2007 6:55:39 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons (has-been))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kitten Festival
Well, I must say I hope so, too. She must indeed be happy to be dragged through the press as if she were some Levantine concubine or nontyping "secretary," feathering a love-nest with ill-gotten gains. But that's nothing to what Riza would have got if she had insisted on sticking to her original job, as was her right. The same is true of Wolfowitz: damned whatever course of action he takes. I read over the weekend that a certain bank "staffer" accused him of cutting off aid to Uzbekistan after that country had canceled the presence of United States bases on its soil. The innuendo was clear: The sinister neocon uses the World Bank to punish any dissent from imperialism. Well, the American breach with President Islam Karimov's kleptocratic and megalomaniac regime came after a few massacres of civilian protesters and the exposure of institutional torture. Do you believe that Wolfowitz would have got better press if he had insisted on keeping up the aid payments after all that?

Aha, you say, but why did Wolfowitz take so long to release these nonincriminating internal memoranda? Who acts so defensively if they have nothing to hide? I have no private information to impart here. But it could be that two grown-up people, both with previous marriages and with growing children, did not feel much like undergoing yet another round of "disclosure." For the sake of apparent propriety, they had already had to submit to some rather exorbitant demands. That's just my guess. But I didn't choose to say anything until I had seen the relevant papers, which are clear and conclusive. I wonder if any of the ravenous pseudo-moralists will feel even the slightest blush once they have done the same.

Sliming Wolfowitz

7 posted on 04/18/2007 7:02:29 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

He should have yanked Tajikistan’s aid as well, they have less publicized human rights violations that are nevertheless disgusting. But he didn’t yank them, he only went after the clowns in uzbekistan. My favorite of his project yankings was one in argentina where he declared that the salaries of the low-income workers ‘excessive.’ Oh, interesting, coming from him!


8 posted on 04/18/2007 7:05:45 PM PDT by Kitten Festival
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

Memo to Hitch: We saw the papers. He’s still wrong.


9 posted on 04/18/2007 7:06:38 PM PDT by Kitten Festival
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kitten Festival
More updates here from WB-linked bloggers.
10 posted on 04/18/2007 7:16:32 PM PDT by Kitten Festival
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kitten Festival

It appears that the majority of your posts are about Paul Wolfowitz. Doesn’t that strike you as bit odd?


11 posted on 04/18/2007 7:17:02 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

I’ll be even more open about what I have in mind on the topic. I’ve seen quite a few situations like that of a young UPS (parcel service) worker—a young man who was known to be trying to be righteous.

While he was working, the young man’s wife had admittedly found another man and decided to divorce her husband (reportedly not forbidden for those of us in the nations by courts but generally “abhorrent” according to authority, correct me as my respected teacher, if I’m wrong). ...no complaints from her about her husband. They had children.

After the judge ordered him to pay “child support” in the amount of half of his pay, the man-haters who ran his UPS office found out about his separation situation and fired him. A father who tried to be righteous was disposed of and alienated from his children. That sort of thing happens very often—even in Israel.

Most of our leaders are allowed to have harems (even looked up to), but men like Wolfowitz and enormous numbers of lesser paid employees are dragged down with accusations of the same behavior.

...little off-topic but maybe not all that much.


12 posted on 04/18/2007 7:21:38 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons (has-been))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

no


13 posted on 04/18/2007 8:36:19 PM PDT by Kitten Festival
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Your ignorance of the facts is appalling. Go back to DU where you belong.


14 posted on 04/18/2007 8:53:53 PM PDT by rebel_yell2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kitten Festival

the whole bush administration is urged to quit! (/s)

the gop is imploding.


15 posted on 04/18/2007 9:41:29 PM PDT by ken21 (it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rebel_yell2
"Your ignorance of the facts is appalling. Go back to DU where you belong."

Your accusation and method of argument are telling. I posted a good reply for you earlier, under my post, "Iran making nuclear fuel in underground plant - IAEA" (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1819670/posts). It's my argument against being overly concerned (or even knowledgeable) about individual celebrities and their social problems.



Comment #4:

That's a very good point, and it should be obvious to us all. But since 1920 (and ratification of a certain Amendment), we've had a political problem that's leading us to national destruction by madness about celebrities and general refusal to consider the consequences of the feminization of our nation--trend toward socialism and eventual destruction of our nation being two of the consequences.

From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 :

  Hysteria \Hys*te"ri*a\, n. [NL.: cf. F. hyst['e]rie. See
     Hysteric.] (Med.)
     A nervous affection, occurring almost exclusively in women,
     in which the emotional and reflex excitability is
     exaggerated, and the will power correspondingly diminished,
     so that the patient loses control over the emotions, becomes
     the victim of imaginary sensations, and often falls into
     paroxism or fits.
     [1913 Webster]
  
     Note: The chief symptoms are convulsive, tossing movements of
           the limbs and head, uncontrollable crying and laughing,
           and a choking sensation as if a ball were lodged in the
           throat. The affection presents the most varied
           symptoms, often simulating those of the gravest
           diseases, but generally curable by mental treatment
           alone. Hysteric







And Giuliani is a lefty.
16 posted on 04/18/2007 9:47:36 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons (has-been))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rebel_yell2
"Your ignorance of the facts is appalling. Go back to DU where you belong."

While being nosy and browsing your "in forum" comments, it appears that my reply wasn't best suited for you after all. From those comments, you've had some anger against the USA and Israel while propagandizing for Lebanon (although you often waffled in order to avoid being banned). ...not to mention your many instances of name calling against other Freepers. Here's a little of the evidence.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1671142/posts?page=58#58

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1671117/posts?page=42#42

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1671117/posts?page=42#42

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1670573/posts?page=92#92

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1667641/posts?page=761#761

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1667641/posts?page=715#715

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1667641/posts?page=698#698

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1667918/posts?page=66#66

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1668018/posts?page=59#59

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1667918/posts?page=59#59
17 posted on 04/18/2007 10:44:12 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons (has-been))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson