He said there was no crime, and it was incidental. What else could he have done?
It was a bogus story that Bush could refute on his own
Apparently not.
but it turned into a freak show because inquiring minds want to know?
I suppose
Because this crap isn’t over yet and it looks like someone else who was doing their job may go to jail it seems the perception is Joe Wilson is still a neutral authoritative source.
I don't think so, what else has Wilson been able to comment on in the NY times?
Other than that he has made several comments since then that aren’t in the best interest of the administration.
Well, that is the crux of it. You think that anyone who claims to be a conservative should act as though they work for the administaration. I don't. Only someone who works for the administration should be expected to never say anything negative about it.
Judith Miller went to jail.
How is that Novaks fault?
Why wasn’t Novak ever threatened with this?
He was. I am stunned you have such a strong opinion about an issue you know so litlle.
Did he and Armitage come clean to the prosecution at the forefront?
Yes, that is well known.
We know Armitage did so I guess Fitzfong new that Novak was a dead end street.
Novak didn't commit any crimes, so why would Fitz be after him?
I suppose his fellow journalists left him alone because they new he had no source to reveal.
Not sure what you mean, what did they have to leave him alone about?
Even though it began with him he seemed to just sit back and watch the fiasco.
First of all, he did defend the admin. He went out of the way to say that there was no crime. what else do you want?
In my opinion he is a jerk.
Why go through the charade of making up reasons he is a jerk? Why don't you just say that "Anyone who doesn't act in the interest of W at all times is a jerk?". That is clearly what you believe. Just say it.