Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Valpal1

Cho’s atty, who was present on the 14th when the ruling was issued was Jerry “Jeel”.


217 posted on 04/23/2007 3:27:27 PM PDT by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets
Note Judge "God

Both Dr Crouse and Judge Banett found that, "Cho Presents an imminent danger to himself as a result of mental illness." That's a quote of the findings. The court ordered outpatient treatment, because of the findings.

The process began when Judge "Godbly" and Justice Williams signed the docs sending Cho to Crouse, on the 13th dec, 2005, on the allegations of the PD and whoever else made them. Barnett's ruling was post exam and was a affirmative finding. That means the court found the allegations to be true and Cho did in fact, "present an imminent danger to himself as a result of mental illness." That resulted in the court ordering treatment, not an exam.

219 posted on 04/23/2007 3:43:43 PM PDT by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson