Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HamiltonJay

That is absolutely correct. How can anyone in their sane mind support this disgusting practice is beyond me. Nor can they really claim that it’s ‘for the health of the mother’ - in the late third trimester she can have the baby at any time if her health deteriorates to the point it is a health risk.


18 posted on 04/18/2007 10:01:12 AM PDT by farlander (Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: farlander

The thing is there are a number of other procedures that will suffice for this type of situation. The SCOTUS just outlawed a brutal practice. Planned Parenthood could give a damn about a woman’s right or health - look at their bottom line. They’re in it for the money. They are part of a multi-billion dollar industry of death. They don’t fool me.


25 posted on 04/18/2007 10:05:32 AM PDT by scuba - doo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: farlander

At the stage where a parial birth would be done, if the mothers life was in dire need to seperate from her child, an emergency cesarian section would be medically indicated. Not a full and complete breach birth... the trama and stress this puts on a woman is far more dangerous than an emergency cesarian.

PP are lying trolls. They are not interested in womens health, just in keeping the dollars rolling in. They are dispicable beasts, who prey on the scared and the helpless. They are the medical equivalent of pedophiles.

I’m sorry, but at this point they have lost any and all credibility as a being a “medical provider”.


26 posted on 04/18/2007 10:06:21 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson