Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ElkGroveDan
This is huge and great news. However...

Abortion opponents say the law will not reduce the number of abortions performed because an alternate method — dismembering the fetus in the uterus — is available and, indeed, much more common.

He said the more common abortion method, involving dismemberment, is beyond the reach of the federal ban.

Many of these babies are viable outside the womb. Can you imagine a doctor dismembering a baby that had been born in order to kill it? It sounds like one of Cho's stories. Yet this is exactly what they do. The only difference is location.

Thank God for today's ruling but there is still a lot of work to do.

9 posted on 04/18/2007 8:26:21 AM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Pete
Its nice to know liberals are advocates of dismemberment. Hannibal Lecter would be proud of them.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

13 posted on 04/18/2007 8:29:06 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Pete
Thank God for today's ruling but there is still a lot of work to do.

Of course. But this ruling also sets the precedent that abortion is not "untouchable".

27 posted on 04/18/2007 8:39:45 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (When toilet paper is a luxury, you have achieved communism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson