Does this ban being upheld, in any way lead us to the possibility of a right to life for the unborn federal law?
Can it now be argued legally that because the unborn have a right to not be aborted by the PBA procedure that they may legally be entitled to further rights, they do not have legally now?
The rights of the unborn seem obvious once they pass a certain age. At some point the mother has given up her right to choose, because as the weeks go by and she hasn’t “chosen” the baby can and should—through a surrogate of course—make the choice and claim the legal right to do so. In other words, once time passes and no choice has been made, the baby, through his/her surrogate, can claim standing. Maybe even suing, a couple of months or so near the point of viability, for the right to pay room and board for the remaining time in the womb, especially if the mother has not made her choice known?