Skip to comments.
Using DWP workers instead of private contractors cost millions
AP via CoCoTimes ^
| 4/17/7
Posted on 04/17/2007 11:56:37 AM PDT by SmithL
LOS ANGELES- Some upgrades to the Department of Water and Power's aging system were shifted from private contractors to costly DWP crews, pushing the price tag up millions of dollars, it was reported.
The Daily News reported Tuesday that a DWP review found that using city crews to install trunk lines roughly doubled the cost and the length of time it would have taken private workers to complete the project.
For instance, a private contractor bid $6.2 million to install a 42-inch pipeline beneath Burbank Boulevard and White Oak Avenue, a project estimated to take 250 days.
When the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 18, objected, the project was turned over to unionized DWP crews, who completed the work in 439 days at a cost of $13.8 million.
"Experience indicates that contractors can complete trunk line projects on a substantially shorter time period than in-house forces," water system chief James McDaniel wrote in a memorandum to DWP general manager Ronald Deaton.
Despite cost overruns, the DWP plans this week to hire a 20-member union crew for a third trunk line project. It's part of a compromise with the union, which agreed not to challenge private contracts for 13 upcoming trunk-line projects.
The 13 future projects will cost rate payers an estimated $737 million, but officials said it could have up to $1.3 billion if DWP workers did the work.
"The settlement agreement clears the way for the department to enter into a number of contracts for essential trunk-line construction work," board president David Nahai said. "At the same time, we have to remember that we need to have in-house capability, as well.
"At the end of the day you can't just continue contracting out."
TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ladwp; unionthugs; yourtaxdollarsatwork
Your tax dollars at work.
1
posted on
04/17/2007 11:56:39 AM PDT
by
SmithL
To: Toddsterpatriot; Mase; expat_panama; nopardons
2
posted on
04/17/2007 11:58:32 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: SmithL
Extortion - pure and simple...
3
posted on
04/17/2007 12:01:01 PM PDT
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: SmithL
....”At the end of the day you can’t just continue contracting out.”....WHY??? It might be cost effective and save taxpayers some money????...Who cares about that!
To: SmithL
Great.....let South Central LA people do the work. LA will never see water again.
5
posted on
04/17/2007 12:04:19 PM PDT
by
RC2
To: SmithL
I work as a private contractor for underground utility work in Los Angeles. It is common knowledge among us in the private sector that the DWP will send out six or seven workers to do a job we can do with two. Not only can we do it with two, but we take fewer days to complete the project too.
6
posted on
04/17/2007 12:04:29 PM PDT
by
skimask
("Hatred is the coward's revenge for being intimidated"....George Bernard Shaw)
To: 1rudeboy; hedgetrimmer; Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The Daily News reported Tuesday that a DWP review found that using city crews to install trunk lines roughly doubled the cost and the length of time it would have taken private workers to complete the project.Thank God a PPP wasn't involved. LOL!
7
posted on
04/17/2007 12:15:50 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so bad at math?)
To: skimask
I had a college friend that worked summers in Michigan for a local water "authority." His job (and the crew's) was to run a video robot between two manholes checking for leaks into the storm drain. He says that they would run the 'bot halfway into the pipe, and then shut it down and drink beer. If a supervisor showed up, they'd fire it back up again in time for him to walk into the "van" and see that they were working.
The supervisors could not check their Thermos containers for booze, either, which was a bonus. Union rules.
8
posted on
04/17/2007 12:23:05 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: Toddsterpatriot
Hey, at least the PPP didn’t make a profit.
9
posted on
04/17/2007 12:24:31 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
LAWP Unionized Workers - doing the jobs taxpayers cannot believe they are paying the freight for.
10
posted on
04/17/2007 12:26:48 PM PDT
by
Wally_Kalbacken
(Seldom right but never in doubt)
To: 1rudeboy
Hey, at least the PPP didnt make a profit.Yeah, double the cost is worth it, just so long as dirty foreigners don't make a profit.
11
posted on
04/17/2007 12:33:16 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so bad at math?)
To: Toddsterpatriot
And our sovereignty remains intact!
12
posted on
04/17/2007 12:34:31 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: Toddsterpatriot
Hey, now that I think about it, think of the benefit to our economy of these union-types earning all this money for their Mob masters.
13
posted on
04/17/2007 12:37:25 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: SmithL
The Daily News reported Tuesday that a DWP review found that using city crews to install trunk lines roughly doubled the cost and the length of time it would have taken private workers to complete the project. Another example of poor investigative reporting. Anybody knows that the city crews are at least 4-5 times less efficient that private contractors. As a result, the Daily News' figures are woefully understated.
14
posted on
04/17/2007 12:40:32 PM PDT
by
Zakeet
(Be thankful we don't get all the government we pay for)
To: 1rudeboy
earning all this money for their American Mob masters
15
posted on
04/17/2007 12:41:29 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so bad at math?)
To: SmithL
Duh...does UNION not mean anything?
To: Shamrock-DW
Same reason 100,000 people were without power 48 hours last week.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson