Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: areafiftyone
Dressing up in womens clothing (a little too often) is a sign that a person is "secure in his manhood"? BS.

While it might be considered "normal" if it was for a halloween costume party, it is otherwize ABNORMAL behavior. Drag queens are usually "in your face" gay, and have all sorts of emotional-mental problems.

Julie Andrews' close association with NAMBLA (Man boy love groups) IS a problem, and added to his other positions on political issues such as gun control, abortion, property rights, etc; It makes him UNELECTABLE, at least as a Republican.
He'd be a shoe in as a Democrat. If he were running under that banner, MSM would be showering him with praise.

32 posted on 04/17/2007 6:38:00 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Nathan Zachary

Good grief!

He’s not Julie Andrews?

What about all the other New Yorkers that dress up for the Inner Circle Charity event?


35 posted on 04/17/2007 6:42:05 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Nathan Zachary
Dressing up in womens clothing (a little too often) is a sign that a person is "secure in his manhood"? BS.

While it might be considered "normal" if it was for a halloween costume party, it is otherwize ABNORMAL behavior.

Exactly.

36 posted on 04/17/2007 6:44:43 AM PDT by Sister_T (The Axis of Idiocy: The LameStream Media, The DemocRATS and the "peaceful" anti-war moonbats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Nathan Zachary

“Julie Andrews’ close association with NAMBLA (Man boy love groups) IS a problem,”

Can you provide any information that directly ties Rudy to NAMBLA? If not, I suspect you are just a little troll trying to stir things up. The “Julie Andrews” line is so childish that I wonder about your maturity level.


39 posted on 04/17/2007 6:50:53 AM PDT by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Nathan Zachary
Julie Andrews is a female movie star, who as far as I know, has never had anything to do with NAMBLA and has only appeared as a woman pretending to be a man, pretending to be a woman in a show, in "VICTOR/VICTORIA".

It is and has been absolutely "normal" for men to dress up as women, in skits, for centuries and not a one of them were homosexuals.

84 posted on 04/17/2007 2:40:17 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Nathan Zachary
Their opinions about NAMBLA became a small minority in the 1980s. The carefree, anything-goes attitude of the previous two decades was replaced by AIDs, Ronald Reagan, the moral majority, and a return to "traditional" values. Roe v Wade compelled Christian conservatives to enter the political arena; and they quickly followed the lead of Anita Bryant in realizing the tactical effectiveness of using the newly discovered problem of child sexual abuse to attack gay men. Without bothering to consider NAMBLA's actual positions, gays groups quickly distanced themselves from NAMBLA, expelling the group from their pride marches and events. Feminists followed suit, and came to associate NAMBLA with the patriarchal society that they believed had been subduing women and victimizing children since feudal times. Most importantly, local police departments across the country saw the recently launched war on "child molesters" as not only a campaign to protect children, but also as an unassailable way to increase their funding. It is in this context of social change, political retreat, and opportunism - not in the homeland security mindset of today - that a reader is best able to appreciate "A Witchhunt Foiled."

In December of 1982 the FBI, in concert with local law enforcement agencies, launched an investigation into whether NAMBLA had any involvement in the 1979 abduction of six-year-old Etan Patz. The investigation began after authorities raided the apartments of two NAMBLA members, and discovered several photographs of a young boy with roughly the same features as Patz. In the next week two New York City newspapers, the Herald American and the New York Times, reported that the Patzes had denied that the boy in the photos was their son. This did not deter law enforcement, however, and the FBI (including a young US Attorney by the name of Rudolph Giuliani) proceeded to leak misleading information to local media outlets in the ensuing weeks in an effort to generate enough public pressure that NAMBLA would fold. The New York Post, the Boston Herald, and the Daily News - coincidentally newspapers that were all owned by Australian media magnate Rupert Murdoch - printed sensational new stories, without any substantiation, that accused NAMBLA of being a "sex club" and a "porn ring." As all of this was unfolding, the FBI reportedly offered to release one of the detained NAMBLA members if he would confess that NAMBLA had assisted in Patz's kidnapping. He persisted in his denials.

Witchhunt Foiled: The FBI Vs. Nambla

http://www.amazon.com/Witchhunt-Foiled-FBI-Vs-Nambla/dp/096154970X?tag=dogpile-20

108 posted on 04/17/2007 5:01:05 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY ((((Truth shall set you free))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson