Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fawn
Looks like Hillary will be our President.

Only if the Republican Party is suckered and lied into nominating Giuliani as our candidate. I guess you better get busy and get an actual Republican nominated and not the divisive liberal that will lose to Hillary.

49 posted on 04/16/2007 5:19:25 PM PDT by Spiff (Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Spiff

“Only if the Republican Party is suckered and lied into nominating Giuliani as our candidate”

Correct!


51 posted on 04/16/2007 5:22:32 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! Or Rudy/Hillary if you want to murder conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Spiff

I would love to see Thompson get in with a great VP....I think we would have a chance with him.


53 posted on 04/16/2007 5:27:37 PM PDT by Fawn (http://www.hartzvictims.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Spiff
I guess you better get busy and get an actual Republican nominated and not the divisive liberal that will lose to Hillary.

I'm not sure why the Rudy folks want us to abandon the formula that has worked in all GOP presidential victories from Reagan on ... nominate a conservative or moderate conservative that is a political ally of social conservatives, though not too closely identified with the Christian right.

Thompson fits that formula. Romney might. Rudy does not.

61 posted on 04/16/2007 6:31:54 PM PDT by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Spiff
Hillary Press Release

From the Senate: Senator Clinton's Statement on Supreme Court's Gonzales v. Carhart Decision

Washington, DC -- "This decision marks a dramatic departure from four decades of Supreme Court rulings that upheld a woman's right to choose and recognized the importance of women's health. Today's decision blatantly defies the Court's recent decision in 2000 striking down a state partial-birth abortion law because of its failure to provide an exception for the health of the mother. As the Supreme Court recognized in Roe v. Wade in 1973, this issue is complex and highly personal; the rights and lives of women must be taken into account. It is precisely this erosion of our constitutional rights that I warned against when I opposed the nominations of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito."

No matter who the Republican Candidate is, after the primaries and the Convention, and even if he wins, somewhere a substantial number of the voters in this country subscribe to the ideas behind this chilling statement from Hillary: an endorsement of imposed death sentences in the operating room that they feel should be sanctioned by law.

Although each of the Republican candidates has now issued a 'pro-forma' support of the Supreme Court ruling on late-term abortion, none has given a clue as to how he intends to roll back the tremendous number of abortions now occuring.

Who will be the first candidate, or potential candidate to lay out his program for accomplishing an end to what is now permitted, in the face over what is sure to be an overwhelming MSM onslaught?

And that is what every Republican candidate, whether we like it or not, is afraid of; coming out and laying out that roll-back program, for fear of being divisive.

147 posted on 04/18/2007 7:50:35 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Hillary: A sociopath's enabler in the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson