To: Lazamataz
Sorry, I don’t buy it. There is nothing in the Constitution to prevent me from owning a nuke. At the time, probably the most destructive weapon was a cannon and private people DID own cannons. When they put these cannons on their private ships, they were called privateers.
11 posted on
04/16/2007 7:49:16 AM PDT by
rhombus
To: rhombus
Sorry, I dont buy it.If you don't agree with me, I'm detonating this nuke.
19 posted on
04/16/2007 7:51:10 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Can’t the liberals start their own countries somewhere, and then surrender?)
To: rhombus
I might have to disagree.
In the Federalist Papers there is a quote about how freedom would remain as long as the common citizen had the same access to arms as the common soldier.
So I take that to mean machine guns and rockets are in and nukes and mustard gas are out.
26 posted on
04/16/2007 7:53:59 AM PDT by
Kilt Dad
("Among the other evils being unarmed brings you, it causes you to be despised")
To: rhombus
I agree and there is nothing that says a weapon must be discriminating.
62 posted on
04/16/2007 8:24:05 AM PDT by
OldEagle
(May you live long enough to hear the legends of your own adventures.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson