'Taken out' by a Chinese national with no ID?
Was he the target? and the rest just window dressing and confusion, or is this just a coincidence?
“From reading his resumee,( Prof. Liviu Librescu )it appears that much of what the professor was active in researching had definite military applications and implications, not just now, but in future warfare.
‘Taken out’ by a Chinese national with no ID?
Was he the target? and the rest just window dressing and confusion, or is this just a coincidence?”
The plot thickens . . .
This whole thing stinks. The KIA/WIA ratio is WAY OFF. This guy was big time proficient with his weapons
Gee, what serendipity that the MURDERER just happened to have several sets of handy chains and padlocks. The chains and padlocks are really big clues to the obvious that this did not originate in a "lovers quarrel". Also, if the MURDERER really shot himself what's the chance it would be in the face? Now if a handler eliminated an expendable dupe-----
And gee, what a coincidence that the NRA convention was this weekend.
And gee, what a coincidence that the District of Corruption handgun ban was just overturned in the courts.
Sorry did not read your post - think you have it exactly right. Window dressing for a planned (PLA?) hit of the Professor. If so, we will never be told these facts. This would be an act of war.