And why the hell shouldn't it? Wake up man! The Beltway snipers were Muzzies. The UNC driver was a Muzzie. John Doe # 2 in OKC is most likely Jose Padilla, a Muzzie.
Care to defend the murderous death cult any more?
OK, well while I thank you all for the history lesson, I’m actually well aware that the “religion of peace” is responsible for quite a few atrocities. I know that it was not reported initially that the Utah shooter was a Muslim. I know it’s a post 9-11 world. I know all of that. I certainly didn’t defend anybody in this case, and I don’t appreciate irrational insults thrown at me with no basis.
What I did say was that plenty of people here seem to automatically assume that the perpetrators of any crime like this are Muslims. While there is a statistically high probability that a terrorist act these days will be committed by Muslims, there is no real evidence in this case that the perpetrator was either a Muslim or religiously motivated. Of course, that could still come out - the authorities in Blacksburg don’t really seem to know a damn thing. The point is you lose credibility when you make assumptions and connect dots when there are none - much like the 9/11 conspiracy nutjobs.