Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GenuineChocolateFace

Speech and assembly have been shown to have limits. So too should gun ownership. I am bothered by the fact that the Constitution specifically mentions militia in connection with bearing arms. Also, I am bothered by the belief that all types of arms are acceptable.

Are all college students to be allowed to concealed carry? Or only the “orthodox, right-thinking” ones? that is what disturbs me. I wouldn’t be surprised if the litmus test for concealed carry has to do with ideology.


1,940 posted on 04/16/2007 1:50:58 PM PDT by Cyclopean Squid (A Day Late and a Dollar Short)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1909 | View Replies ]


To: Cyclopean Squid
Speech and assembly have been shown to have limits. So too should gun ownership.

Yes, but these are things like "time, place, and manner" restrictions, because if I walk around with a bullhorn at 2:30 in the morning, I might bother people. In such a situation, the very act of speech itself is harmful to those around me, so we have some--very few--regulations.

Not true with carrying a weapon. Unlike speech, the very act of carrying a weapon--in and of itself--is harmless to those around me, and, as such, should not be subject to restriction.

If you want to pass laws that give severe penalties to those who use a weapon in the commission of a crime, fine. But don't restrict my right to carry a weapon, which, by itself, is completely harmless.

1,999 posted on 04/16/2007 1:56:22 PM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1940 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson