You don't like it when I point out that your blanket statements about Giuliani's position are false. And now you are a mindreader into how Rudy will conduct the war on terror. I suspect he'll take it on like he took on the mob in NYC.
Only in your own Rudy-addled brain do you show my statements about Rudy are false.
But, then again, I haven't drunk gallons of Rudi-Aid the way you have. So I look at what Rudy has done, not just what he says.
He has a 100 percent NARAL rating. He addressed them, twice. And although he says is personally opposed to abortion, just about every pro-choice Dem says that.
Throw in Rudy's re-defining of strict constructionism to allow upholding of Roe, his declaration that abortion funding is a right, and now his statement that the GOP should move on past abortion, and your claim that I am misstating Rudy is pure bunk.
Once again, I look at what Rudy has done.
He used the 1997 Empire State Building terrorist shooting (which he refused to call such) as a springboard to call for more federal gun control laws.
He, against the advice of emergency professionals, kept the ECC at WTC7 - in the midst of a known terrorist target.
And he pushed a corrupt crony for the most important anti-terror job in the country.
So far, his record is less than stellar. Nothing he has done merits the claim that he is the best choice to lead the WOT.
Funny that you mention mob (*coughKerikcough*).
But I digress, I thought we wanted someone who would fight this war as a...well, war. Not as another "law enforcement" operation.