Replies

I would support Land sitting out the election on principle.

I don’t know what principle he would use to vote FOR Hillary Clinton over Rudy.

Now, if Hillary was a pro-life, pro-2nd-amendment democrat, I could understand a person voting his philosophy over party.

But as liberal as Rudy is, I can’t think of any issue of importance where Rudy is more liberal or more wrong than Hillary.

Hillary does of course have much more experience with the issues that effect this country, having sat in the White house for 8 years and having served in a federal legislature for another 7 years. That gives here a much broader understanding of the concerns of the world than a guy who was nothing more than mayor of a single city.

But experience isn’t everything, and for Land, who certainly is voting morals, the only morals Hillary has over Rudy is that Hillary never got divorced, even when her husband cheated on her. For whatever reason, she did keep her vow to stay married.

But as liberal as Rudy is, I can’t think of any issue of importance where Rudy is more liberal or more wrong than Hillary.

I can...

....Hillary does of course have much more experience with the issues that effect this country, having sat in the White house for 8 years and having served in a federal legislature for another 7 years. That gives here a much broader understanding of the concerns of the world than a guy who was nothing more than mayor of a single city.

But experience isn’t everything, and for Land, who certainly is voting morals, the only morals Hillary has over Rudy is that Hillary never got divorced, even when her husband cheated on her. For whatever reason, she did keep her vow to stay married.

Hillary is a flaming socialist, a proven liar and drooling at the prospects of pushing us further toward the socialist model of Europe. Her concerns are just that. Rudy's are for self-help and fiscal conservatism. He'll appoint conservative justices. If you can't see the difference, this divide isn't about life it's about politics.