[dmw]

Hey Rooty Tooters, why do you care what this guy does? You been telling us socons, over the past few months, to go to he!!. You and your “invincible” leader have made it clear that you don’t need us in the party. Now you guys get your wish and you start acting like a bunch of cry babies.

What many of us have been trying to tell you over the past few months is—if you are going tell us socons to “get out of the party” then be prepared for the consequences. It will be you, and you alone, who will be responsible for Hillary becoming the next POTUS if Rudy gets nominated (he won’t).

Your message has been loud and clear, now the socons are responding. Let’s see how it works out for you not having us conservatives in the republican party—you hypocritical liberals.

[Wormwood]

You been telling us socons, over the past few months, to go to he!!.

And how have fiscal conservatives and small-government conservatives fared under the Bush administration?

Turnabout is fair play.

[freespirited]

What many of us have been trying to tell you over the past few months is—if you are going tell us socons to “get out of the party” then be prepared for the consequences. It will be you, and you alone, who will be responsible for Hillary becoming the next POTUS if Rudy gets nominated (he won’t)....Your message has been loud and clear, now the socons are responding.

I havent seen anyone here advocate that so-cons "get out of the party" nor have I heard any of the candidates so advocate. I have heard Rudy say that making abortion the party litmus test is a bad idea. That hardly meets your description.

Let’s see how it works out for you not having us conservatives in the republican party—you hypocritical liberals.

So IOW, anyone who isnt a so-con is a liberal? That's absurd and you know it. If there weren't different types of conservatism (fiscal, natl defense, etc), you wouldn't need to call your brand "social conservatism."