No, Richard Land is well known in Baptist circles. I think what he was saying is that the GOP frontrunners are little different from HRC; so he might as well vote for HRC, not that he really would. Of course, there is the sit-out and Constitution Party options too.
Gotcha — makes sense. While he may not actually vote for HRC in the privacy of the voting booth, he makes his point — ‘whats the difference?’
Personally I can deal with policy differences, even major ones if the candidate is one who WILL STICK to principles— i.e., do what they say, and say what they do, persistently.
Thanks for the reply.