Posted on 04/15/2007 6:31:50 AM PDT by wildbill
“Youve added nothing to the discussion.”
What I did (in my post #36) was post a link to an older article (and the actual title of said article) that supported and expanded upon the information claimed by the beekeeper in the article posted at #28 by dawn.....PARTICULARLY the France connection!
In your arrogance you chose to (laughably in post # 164, 13 hours later) state the obvious in a way that conjured ignorance or confusion on my part, on the heels of the 2 posts referenced above.
What I did and what I said totally supported post # 28, AND NOTHING MORE.
Now you may go and yap at someone elses ankle.....I am not one bit confused about neonicotinoids or their chronology. And, fwiw, I’m not one bit confused about you either.
>>in a way that conjured ignorance
>>or confusion on my part, on
It's interesting that you choose to interpret it that way.
If my comment "conjured ignorance or confusion" for you, then I apologize. That was not what I intended. My intent was only to point out to anyone reading the thread that Gaucho, Imadicloprid, and Neonicitinoids are the same thing - and, as you did not quote anything from the post you were responding to, this relationship is not clear in your post #36.
Now, why don't we just dump the personal baggage and move on with a constructive discussion of the situation and possible solutions?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.