I am one of those scientist types you disparage so much.
One part of being a scientist is that I do not feel comfortable arguing the genome as I have little training in that field. Non-scientists such as yourself, with no training in any field, seem not to be bothered by their lack of expertise. A quick trip to AIG and stay at a Holiday Inn Express and you're all set to tell scientists how things really are.
The sections of AIG that I have checked, in my fields, where I can tell good from bad and accurate from inaccurate, are pretty pathetic. Why should I assume that the others are any better?
[A quick trip to AIG and stay at a Holiday Inn Express and you’re all set to tell scientists how things really are.]
No coyote- I’m set to point out gaping holes and glaring impossibilities and problematic hurdles with the evolution model. You are correct, I don’t have a ‘scientist’ badge to produce- was too sick to pursue a degree- but that doesn’t mean I haven’t been able to use common sense and to understand that the biolgoy we were spoon fed in school was full of lies and deceitful assertions as well as equally deceitful ommissions meant to keep the full facts from the students because the full facts showed glaring discrepencies to what we were being fed.
[I am one of those scientist types you disparage so much]
I’m sorry- didn’t realize disparaging was exclusive to evo scientists- will have to keep that in mind next time you deride ID’ers.
You are quite a legend in your own mind.