[Al Simmons]

"You think a conclusion that something is either a chicken a frog or a newt is good science and call me scary? Based on your goofy list of questions, I guess I can understand why you might see a close relationship between chickens and newts. Like I said, I just hope my tax dollars had nothing to do with this "science"."

If this quote is representative of your overall ability to understand scientific text, I thank God you'll never be piloting any plane I'm gonna be in....

[Rokke]

"If this quote is representative of your overall ability to understand scientific text, I thank God you'll never be piloting any plane I'm gonna be in...."

Scientific text? Looks like an AP article to me. But if you're happy with these tight scientific conclusions, you probably don't need an airplane to enjoy the flight your on.

[jim35]

[If this quote is representative of your overall ability to understand scientific text, I thank God you’ll never be piloting any plane I’m gonna be in....]

If you find that skepticism involving the science of 68 million year old connective tissue proteins means the skeptic must be a drooling idiot, then you have some pretty unusual standards for measuring intelligence. Maybe you’re just offended by someone insulting your faith?