Answers in Genesis is an apologetics (i.e., Christianity-defending) ministry, dedicated to enabling Christians to defend their faith, and to proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ effectively.-- About Answers in Genesis
(A) PRIORITIES-- AiG Statement of Faith1. The scientific aspects of creation are important, but are secondary in importance to the proclamation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. ...(B) BASICS1. The 66 books of the Bible are the written Word of God. The Bible is divinely inspired and inerrant throughout. Its assertions are factually true in all the original autographs. It is the supreme authority in everything it teaches. ...(D) GENERAL
3. The account of origins presented in Genesis is a simple but factual presentation of actual events and therefore provides a reliable framework for scientific research into the question of the origin and history of life, mankind, the Earth and the universe. ...1. Scripture teaches a recent origin for man and the whole creation. ...
6. No apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record.
AiG relies on apologetics --defense of faith instead of scientific research as it's argument.
Science; Learn it. live it. love it.
Ahahaha- yep- scientific evidence that shows another equally plausible conclusion such as design and might suggest creation automatically disqualify the scientific evidence- Sorry fella- biological evidences do suggest design more so than random mutations- Evolution relies on apologetics to defend the hypothesis of evolution every bit as much- so, if you’re trying to assert that apologetics disqualify the science- I guess you’re willing to disqualify evolution science as well.
You can make all the ‘apologetics’ accusations you like- the soundness of the science stands and can’t be waved away with such glib ignorance of what is presented.
Tell me, how’s the ‘missing link’ situation coming in eovlution? or the macro-evolution argument? or the abiogenisis argument? I ask because all the arguments put forth by evolutionists HAVE to rely on the very SAME OPINIONS that you villify creation scientists for having- so please- do keep making the broad dismissal accusations of ‘apologetics’- it just further shows the same biased head in the sand attitudes that can’t deal with coutner evidences..
Now, if you’d like to take on the specific science that is presented- I’d be more than happy to engage in a discussion about the facts- if not- then I’ll simply assume the problems with evolutio nare too much for some to handle and necessitate petty attacks on organizations simply because they -gasp- have opinions about the facts that are discovered.
Science- learn it, live it, love it.