No, you asked me a frivolous question, which seems to be the only type of question you can formulate.
Sorry, I don't waste time digging around in old statutes. The USC eliminates the need to do so. Unless, of course, you can make a showing that 26 USC is somehow inconsistent with the underlying laws. Start with Public Law 83-591, 68A Stat. 3, the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and work your way forward through all of the statutory amendments. Maybe you'll find something.
Good luck. Thousands of very smart criminal defense lawyers haven't been able to do it. Their clients wouldn't be sitting in prison if they could have somehow done it, so I don't think I'll hold my breath waiting for you to do it.
It's too bad that you're confused about U.S. tax law. But, that ain't my problem. At least you've stopped pimping that pile of tax protester propaganda that you call a movie.
I see. So you copy and paste a bunch of amendment law and I ask you why you did it and you come back that my question is frivolous.
That’s a sign of someone that does not want to answer the question because they’ve been caught stepping in it. That’s Ok, you put out enough info here for alot more ‘frivolous’ questions.
We’ll get to those in time. And if you don’t want to answer them, then I will fill in the blanks for you.
So your score for answering the first simple question is zero.
The '54 IRC passed both houses of Congress as HR-8300 and Eisenhower signed it on August 16, 1954, creating Public Law 83-591. There you go. Have at it. Thousands of lawyers have had over 50 years to bring that one magic case that got PL 83-591 ruled unconstitutional. Hasn't happened.
So the simple 'frivolous' question now posed to you is, has the original source law for the personal income tax and its 'voluntary' filing requirements only been into effect since 1954?
If it's too 'frivolous' for you, or irritates you too much coming from a 'criminal tax protestor' like me, then don't bother to answer, I will answer for you.