Posted on 04/13/2007 11:40:45 AM PDT by meg88
After appearing on the CNN programs Lou Dobbs and Anderson Cooper 360, Jason Whitlock may be on his way to national stardom not as a sportswriter but as a pundit and political commentator.
We went to Youtube for evidence and by jolly there it was. Among Whitlocks greatest hits on MSNBC's Tucker Carlson show (and were paraphrasing here): Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are domestic terrorists lighting fires and picking everyones pocket on the way out of town. Jackson should be down at Duke apologizing to those lacrosse players he owes them an apology for stirring up that mess. Black America is tired of Jackson.
Wow. Tucker Carlson, clad in that annoying bowtie, closes with: I nominate you, Jason Whitlock.
Hold up. Lets check the trajectory here: KC Star to ESPN, ESPN to Sports Reporters and PTI, and then losing the ESPN TV gigs for talking to a blog. Six months later, hes becoming a social and political commentator who is dictating the agenda of black America.
Minutes ago, the wife just called out, theres a sportswriter on CNN totally destroying Al Sharpton. Curious, we checked it out. It was Whitlock! Well say this dude knows how to put Al Sharpton in place. We half expected Sharpton to respond the way Scoop Jackson did when Whitlock blasted him in the interview with us whats with the black on black crime? Instead, Sharpton remained mostly silent.
Dont think were quite ready to summarize Whitlocks actions - its not even freakin 9 a.m. - but this story has consumed us all morning. A sportswriter on the NBC Today show is kind of a big deal
the jump, weve got the transcript of Whitlock vs. Sharpton]
S. OBRIEN: Well, Don Imus, as weve been telling you all morning, is now out of a job. Leading the charge to take him off the air was the Reverend Al Sharpton. But Kansas City Star columnist Jason Whitlock says Sharptons outrage is focused in the wrong direction.
Both gentlemen are joining us this morning.
Nice to see you. Thank you for talking with us.
First and foremost, Reverend, lets begin with you. How do you feel today? I mean, what happened was exactly what you had asked for from the get-go. So is vindicated the right word? Do you feel progress was made?
AL SHARPTON, CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIVIST: No. I think that its a lot more to do.
You know, weve been fighting this battle the last couple of years, and it intensified about whats happening on the airwaves, whats happening in many of our communities. National Action Network, my group, two years ago at our convention said we were going after some of these music companies, some of these people that have polluted airwaves. Have had meetings with the FCC.
Imus fell within the whole spear of that, and certainly within the spear of what we fight, civil rights. So when the National Association of Black Journalists came out and looked and called for his firing, we came out right behind them, and the rest became history. But I think its really sad that we have to address these issues.
This is 2007 and have to still talk about these kind of things. How could we feel good about it?
S. OBRIEN: At the same time, Jason, you said that you actually thought in all of this Imus was irrelevant and insignificant. Im quoting you on that. What do you mean? Why?
JASON WHITLOCK, KANSAS CITY STAR: To us. To us as black people, he carries no weight in our community. He has no influence over us. He doesnt define us.
Hes not the one defining our women as bitches and hos. We know who that is.
Don Imus is insignificant, and weve turned him into this all- powerful figure, and actually have put these young women at risk. Theyre now being harassed, death threats because people dont
S. OBRIEN: So let me stop you there. Are you saying then it was wrongheaded to go after Don Imus in the way that
WHITLOCK: I think that an apology should have been demanded from Don Imus, and we should have asked MSNBC and CBS, you guys deal with him. Hes an idiot. And then moved on from there.
The press conferences, the over-the-top picketing, reaction, all, it just all went way too far. Don Imus doesnt doesnt move us, doesnt carry any weight in our community. He doesnt define us.
S. OBRIEN: Then let me get to the Reverend Sharpton, because, of course, you talk about the picketing and the calls for protests. I mean, hes talking about you.
SHARPTON: Again, my argument is not with him. I think when the young ladies had their press conference they made it very clear when Essence spokes that they were aware of what we were doing and was happy with what we were doing.
So, I mean, again, these girls are very intelligent and speak for themselves. I think the issue now is where we go from here.
Imus was just a portion of preserving the airwaves. And I think you cant, at one hand, as we have, challenge the hip-hoppers and challenged those that are doing this daily in our community, but Im also challenging others, saying, because you are big and because you have these presidential candidates and senators on your show, we will take you on.
And he says that MSNBC and CBS should have been told to deal with them. Thats what we did. We told them to deal with him.
S. OBRIEN: Well, at the same time, though, there are certainly many rappers who use those words all the time, all the time, and have for a long time. And those rappers who, in many cases, are, you know, represented by Universal. Universal is owned by NBC.
I mean, theres a big connection. Thats a big corporation.
SHARPTON: Exactly.
S. OBRIEN: So, whats
SHARPTON: And thats part of two things in both the NBC CEO meeting and the meeting with CBS. We said, weve got to talk about your other side here, your entertainment side. Weve got to talk about the fact that many of you are in the business of this whole climate that is devastating our community. And weve got to talk about the lack of inclusion of people of color on the airwaves. I mean, if you look at America and look at most of our primetime shows, you dont even see us. And you dont see us behind the camera, where maybe if someone was in the studios, then Imus would not have gotten away with this for years.
S. OBRIEN: Let me give a final question to Jason this morning.
And its going to be about a case that we followed, as well, which are these three young men from Duke University who really had their lives ruined for the last year, to put it pretty simply. Do you think that there should have been people marching and calling for justice for them?
WHITLOCK: Absolutely. Absolutely. Absolutely.
S. OBRIEN: In all communities?
WHITLOCK: You must maintain the moral high ground. You must have some consistency about you.
Injustice for one is injustice for all. Those young men were exploited the same way these young basketball players have been exploited by Jesse and Al. They run around the country exploiting these young people, making problems where making the problems much bigger than what they should be.
These three kids down at Duke, these basketball players have been used and exploited, and its unfortunate.
Sharpton started preaching when he was FOUR...LOL!!! and he was ordained when he was TEN!!!
You must also learn to speak in rhyming doggrel.
Like: "If the shoe fit, you must take a dump."
(I'm not very good at it..)
D-CHI!!!
Had to work that in for Scoop.
Here’s what Scoop had to say way back in 1979, it’s quite relevant to the issues of today:
“I believe that international terrorism is a modern form of warfare against liberal democracies. I believe that the ultimate but seldom stated goal of these terrorists is to destroy the very fabric of democracy. I believe that it is both wrong and foolhardy for any democratic state to consider international terrorism to be ‘someone else’s’ problem.... Liberal democracies must acknowledge that international terrorism is a ‘collective problem.’”
That’s a Democrat I can respect. Crying out loud, I’d love to hear more of that from the ‘Republican’ party!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.