[freespirited]

Giuliani attempted to sidestep the implications of his position by promising not to change existing law. Fine, but would he stop Congress from changing existing law? The Senate in 2009 almost certainly will be Democratic; at present, at least, the House could easily remain in Democratic hands. In that case only a presidential veto is likely to preserve the law unchanged.

I have to disagree here. The Hyde Amendment has to be renewed every year. Every year since 1976, it has been. Much of that time we had Democrats running Congress and the Senate.

[DManA]

There is a good political reason that the democrats have never dared to go as far as Rudy has with his radical pro-abortion position.