Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blaze Burning in the Hollywood Hills [Los Angeles, CA]
Local ABC Station ^ | April 12, 2007 | Staff

Posted on 04/12/2007 3:05:36 PM PDT by La Enchiladita

LOS ANGELES, Apr. 12, 2007 - Fires erupted in the hills above Los Angeles, damaging or destroying several homes, and in high desert brush Thursday as dangerous north winds swept dry Southern California, knocking out power to thousands and triggering a fatal highway pileup in a blinding sandstorm.

About 150 firefighters and water-dropping helicopters battled a 15-acre blaze in grass in the hilly Beverly Glen area above the city of Beverly Hills, said Los Angeles Fire Department spokesman Ron Myers.

With windspeeds upward of 50 mph, fires erupted on the roofs of homes and several were damaged or destroyed but there were no specific details, Myers said.

Beverly Glen is a neighborhood of expensive homes on the south face of the Santa Monica Mountains.

Firefighters also battled a structure fire in Beverly Hills but it was not immediately known if it was related to the brush fire, which erupted about 1 p.m. Myers said.

Southern California is extremely fire-prone after a dry winter. Downtown Los Angeles has recorded less than 2½ inches of rain since July 1.

Power outages hit about 29,500 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power customers and 2,000 Southern California Edison customers, said spokespersons for the utilities.

(Excerpt) Read more at abclocal.go.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: beverlyglen; wildfire; wind
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last
To: ArmstedFragg
Same old story: Brush Fire Flying Embers Shake Roofs.

Shake roofs are so dangerous. They go up like a matchbox. I don't understand why building codes don't prevent builders from using shake shingles in wildfire areas.

I am not in a wildfire area, but still, I feel so much safer with a tile roof over my head. I think someone would have to throw a fire bomb inside my house to get it to burn. It is all stucco and tile on the outside.

101 posted on 04/12/2007 6:57:57 PM PDT by Mama_Bear (My heroes wear camouflage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
It's still windy here, but the palm trees are back standing 12 o'clock straight up.

You're right, despite all the natural disasters which occur here, there's still much to be thankful for.

102 posted on 04/12/2007 7:07:29 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
Thanks Dita!

Hey, did you hear that Imus got fired? :)

103 posted on 04/12/2007 7:36:00 PM PDT by Aquamarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mama_Bear

Codes do forbit shake for new construction in most communities. However, most of the housing in the desirable hillside neighborhoods was built before those changes, and they weren’t made retroactive. As Karl pointed out, the BelAir fire was one of the early examples and there have been regular incidents every five years or so that continue to providing evidence of the silliness of putting a wood roof on a house that’s near a lot of frequently burning wood.

The scariest thing, which happened today, is when you get flying brands and ‘new starts’ five blocks away from where the fire is. That kind of situation can very easily run through a block of homes before you can react to it. The Glendale fire somewhere around the mid eighties was an example of that kind of spotting.

When you combine flamable roofs, poor access, large amounts of natural fuel, and limited water supplies major losses of homes are inevitable. About the only thing open to conjecture is ‘when’?


104 posted on 04/12/2007 8:03:05 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg
When you combine flamable roofs, poor access, large amounts of natural fuel, and limited water supplies major losses of homes are inevitable. About the only thing open to conjecture is ‘when’?

That's right. Very scary.

You seem to know about building codes. When a house is sold in a wildfire area does it have to be brought up to code, ie: the shake roof repaced with non-flammable material? I flat out wouldn't buy a house with a shake roof anywhere, unless I was prepared to re-roof it.

105 posted on 04/12/2007 8:12:52 PM PDT by Mama_Bear (My heroes wear camouflage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum; Mama_Bear

Nor would I care about the politics of the firefighters who came to save my home, save the land and the wildlife... not one whit.

Sorry about your bad experience, Knitting. I can only imagine what it is like.


106 posted on 04/12/2007 8:28:42 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (Lamb of God, you take away the sins of the world. Have mercy on us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Aquamarine
Noooo....:) I barely knew that he and his show existed, let alone his firing from it.

I have the feeling it's being thoroughly discussed... somewhere.

107 posted on 04/12/2007 8:35:26 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (Lamb of God, you take away the sins of the world. Have mercy on us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
Nor would I care about the politics of the firefighters who came to save my home, save the land and the wildlife... not one whit.

Dittos. :-)

108 posted on 04/12/2007 9:19:17 PM PDT by Mama_Bear (My heroes wear camouflage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Mama_Bear

Codes are a really weird topic in this state. Every community has its own rules, then in many instances they pick and choose among the standard codes which are going to apply to their community. In the communities with which I’m familiar, the building codes are applied at the time of construction and at the time any significant remodel is done. So, if you had to pull a building permit to do a re-roof you’d probably run into the non-flamable requirement. Absent that, at least in the cities I’m familiar with, the old roof stays.

Just kind of an interesting factoid... a few years back, in Oxnard, a guy bought a house, then ripped off the original roof and put a shake roof on it in violation of the code. There’s been a multi-year court battle there with contempt citations, jail time threatened, the whole thing. The city’s not going to give up ‘til the guy tears off the shake. I wouldn’t be surprised if eventually the city’ll have to do it and put a lien on his property for the cost.


109 posted on 04/12/2007 9:19:52 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg
Codes are a really weird topic in this state.

Yep, and I should know that. My husband has been vice-chairman of the planning commission in our town here in the Central San Joaquin Valley for several years.

...a few years back, in Oxnard, a guy bought a house, then ripped off the original roof and put a shake roof on it in violation of the code.

Well, that's just crazy. It's not like a shake roof is particularly attractive, although I guess it might go better with certain types of architecture than tile or composition roofing material, still there is good reason why they aren't allowed in certain areas of this state.

I am all for property owners rights, and I hate government controls as much as the next guy, but many of the building codes are for the the homeowners own good in the long run.

Well, God bless and protect the firefighters. They do a heck of job under very difficult and dangerous conditions.

110 posted on 04/12/2007 9:33:22 PM PDT by Mama_Bear (My heroes wear camouflage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; BurbankKarl; BenLurkin

It was the worst wind we’ve ever had out here at the compound. The A.V. has its share of bad wind days, but this week has blown them all away. HA! I made a pun.

We had a fire up here, too, in Palmdale. I think they made quick work of it, since I couldn’t find info about it anywhere.

Ben, did you have any damage from the bluster?


111 posted on 04/12/2007 9:45:32 PM PDT by lainie ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C. S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg; La Enchiladita

KNX said earlier that it’s believed to have been started by blown-down power lines.


112 posted on 04/12/2007 9:48:21 PM PDT by lainie ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C. S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: lainie

Thanks, I hadn’t heard that one.

Wind advisories have just expired. I agree, the wind has been like nothing I’ve seen in an eon...

Fox11 reporting from Palmdale now.


113 posted on 04/12/2007 10:07:53 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (Lamb of God, you take away the sins of the world. Have mercy on us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: lainie
I still think the best comment on the situation that I ever heard was one that I have to paraphrase because I’ve never been able to find it again, but it something along the lines of....

Every few years, in the hills near Mulholland Drive, a little spark ignites. That spark is quickly fanned into flame by the Santa Ana winds, and begins a relentless march westward. The City and County of Los Angeles marshal all their resources, thousands of men, aircraft, bulldozers, crew carriers and fire trucks, and spend millions of dollars in labor costs. And their efforts do not go unrewarded... they usually manage to save.... the Pacific Ocean.

114 posted on 04/12/2007 10:11:12 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: lainie

SOME OF THE PEAK WIND GUSTS TODAY (SINCE 6 AM PDT) INCLUDE LOS ANGELES COUNTY LOS ANGELES INTL AIRPORT.................WEST 38 MPH. DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES....................NORTH 39 MPH HAWTHORNE...........................NORTHWEST 44 MPH. LONG BEACH AIRPORT......................NORTH 41 MPH. BURBANK.................................NORTH 48 MPH. VAN NUYS................................NORTH 46 MPH. WHITTIER HILLS......................NORTHWEST 56 MPH NEWHALL.................................NORTH 46 MPH. SAUGUS..............................NORTHWEST 65 MPH. CAMP NINE...............................NORTH 64 MPH. CHILAO..............................NORTHWEST 51 MPH. CLEAR CREEK..............................EAST 64 MPH. SANDBERG................................NORTH 69 MPH. WARM SPRINGS........................NORTHWEST 75 MPH. WHITAKER PEAK.......................NORTHWEST 86 MPH. PALMDALE............................NORTHWEST 52 MPH. POPPY PARK..........................NORTHWEST 65 MPH. LANCASTER...........................NORTHWEST 54 MPH. VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO................................WEST 37 MPH. PIRU....................................NORTH 39 MPH. ROSE VALLEY.........................NORTHWEST 54 MPH. SANTA BARBARA COUNTY SANTA BARBARA AIRPORT...............NORTHWEST 45 MPH. LAS FLORES CANYON.......................NORTH 43 MPH. MONTECITO HILLS.........................NORTH 47 MPH. SANTA MARIA.........................NORTHWEST 40 MPH. SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SAN LUIS OBISPO.....................NORTHWEST 37 MPH. MORRO BAY...........................NORTHWEST 39 MPH. CARRIZO.................................NORTH 45 MPH.


115 posted on 04/12/2007 11:36:47 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: lainie

No damage here but the neighbors must be about pretty darn tired of racket from the wind chimes.


116 posted on 04/13/2007 6:24:55 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Were you at the University?

Traffic wasn’t as bad as the email alert we received. I think most of the signal problems were north of Wilshire — I go south down the 405 parking lot so it wasn’t anymore congested than any other day.


117 posted on 04/13/2007 9:37:49 AM PDT by InsensitiveConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita; ArmstedFragg; BurbankKarl; BenLurkin
Check this out. KNBC-TV reported (last night) the possibility that the L.A. city power lines fell, into L.A. city property (DWP actually), and that the cause of the blaze burgeoning was uncleared brush. The DWP dropped the ball on their own property-clearing.

This regarding the Franklin Cyn fire yesterday (one home lost, two others damaged? not sure.)

118 posted on 04/13/2007 10:02:12 AM PDT by lainie ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C. S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: lainie

Oh my! Kind of reminds me of the Cedar fire a few years back in San Diego County. The biggest complaints heard were from the environmentalists who whined and moaned about all the habitat destroyed. One of the main reasons USFS couldn’t get to the scene early on was that those same environmentalists had opposed maintaining fire roads.


119 posted on 04/13/2007 10:09:45 AM PDT by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: lainie

oh yes, Councilman Jack Weiss was all over television blaming his own city for the fire.


120 posted on 04/13/2007 10:30:51 AM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson