Replies

To: Petronski; Ultra Sonic 007; oceanview; Peach

He’s running for the doors and preparing to throw the American effort in Iraq under the bus....

Or maybe he's accepting the reality that if Nancy and Harry get their way, that will already have happened before the 2008 elections.

I don't like the implication that we "can't win in Iraq." But Ultra I was off searching for a more solid quote than what is in the article.

But he's correct that the War on Terror will not be completely won or lost in Iraq.

55 posted on 04/12/2007 6:48:26 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (http://wardsmythe.com)

To: Corin Stormhands

I don't like the implication that we "can't win in Iraq."

It's Rudy's implication. He's running for the exits, for what he calculates will be political gain.

59 posted on 04/12/2007 6:51:58 PM PDT by Petronski (FRED!)

To: Corin Stormhands

But Ultra I was off searching for a more solid quote than what is in the article.

So did I. I couldn't find anything. Hopefully someone else can. I want to make sure.

But he's correct that the War on Terror will not be completely won or lost in Iraq.

I agree, but I don't like his implication that the consequences of failure will be less-than-disastrous.

83 posted on 04/12/2007 7:16:58 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (Why vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008? Look at my profile.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794