Or maybe he's accepting the reality that if Nancy and Harry get their way, that will already have happened before the 2008 elections.
I don't like the implication that we "can't win in Iraq." But Ultra I was off searching for a more solid quote than what is in the article.
But he's correct that the War on Terror will not be completely won or lost in Iraq.
It's Rudy's implication. He's running for the exits, for what he calculates will be political gain.
So did I. I couldn't find anything. Hopefully someone else can. I want to make sure.
But he's correct that the War on Terror will not be completely won or lost in Iraq.
I agree, but I don't like his implication that the consequences of failure will be less-than-disastrous.