You said — “I think he’s made too many enemies and is viewed as too hot headed.”
I believe I’ve read the description — “polarizing”. And I suppose that might be true. And so, if one is passionate on issues and agressive, I suppose one will be polarizing.
I’ll vote for him, initially, because it will force the other candidates to address issues that they might not want to address. For that much, I’ll vote for him, although I don’t expect to see him in the general election.
Regards,
Star Traveler
Am all for using him to scare folks into sanity toward Conservative principles and candidates.
Was very sobered and dismayed tonight to hear on C2C some charachter who evidently has predicted accurately for a decade or 3 the popular vote winner of the PResidential elections—asserting that
HARXIST—SHRILLERY WILL WIN 2008—over Guillani.
We must do all we can to prevent that. Must.
If she can win over Rudy . . . what chance do even Hunter or Thompson have against her? Sheesh!