Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Chief Justice Rehnquist is a speech in 2000 admits that the matter of just who may suspend habeas corpus has not been authoritatively answered to this day. Don't you think he would know?

If those are his words, then no. It's quite clear. If there was any debate before--which there wasn't--then it was answered by Hamdi.

179 posted on 04/12/2007 1:23:31 PM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]


To: Publius Valerius
If those are his words, then no. It's quite clear. If there was any debate before--which there wasn't--then it was answered by Hamdi.

They are his words, but it's a shame that he never had the chance to learn just how wrong he was since he died before you could set him straight.

I'm not sure how it could have been answered by Hamdi, either. In Hamdi v Rumsfeld habeas corpus again had not been suspended. Not by the president. Not by Congress. The matter before the court was whether a U.S. citizen could be denied due process not who suspended it. The Court ruled they could not.

217 posted on 04/12/2007 1:51:35 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson