So that's your whole argument? So if I understand your logic here, I must either agree with a frivolous legal argument, or that means I am siding with the other party?
90 posted on 04/12/2007 10:42:07 AM PDT by MACVSOG68
So that's your whole argument? So if I understand your logic here, I must either agree with a frivolous legal argument, or that means I am siding with the other party?
Actually, I think you're just trolling.
93 posted on 04/12/2007 10:43:37 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
(Laws that infringe on unalienable rights are not laws at all...they are in fact lawless edicts.)