Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MACVSOG68
Now what would you call that?
Attacking you back after you attacked me. I can show you exactly where you attacked me.
As I said...show me where I "attacked" you "first".
You still haven't done so, all the while crying FOUL!

From your very first post to me, you were dissembling by attempting to tear down the wording of every post I made.
That is your opinion. Is that what you consider "attacking" you to be? ROTFLOL! And it wasn't "every" post you made by a long shot. Exaggeration isn't helping you.
You made no sense, but I hung in there attempting to explain the obvious.
Thanks for your opinion. Perhaps it's just you.
And don't forget, you changed your "obvious" (All laws are "do such and such or else".) to maybe I was right after all (Perhaps there are a few exceptions, but not many.) so that "argument" is BS too.
You didn't have the knowledge to counter my comments, so you tried to turn them into a logic lesson, something you have no ability to do.
Another snipe at my intelligence I see. It isn't the first time so it's no big deal. (see "where you attacked me" above if you can't follow that train of logic)
I saw later that you were part of this ridiculous tax and fed protest group, and then understood your motives.
And how is that? Simply by stating that a certain movie was good?
I was warned privately by two posters who apparently know your nefarious motives and style, but tried nevertheless to give you the benefit of the doubt.
Oh, I'm scared now that two whole posters disagree with me. Just what do they claim my "nefarious motives" are?

As I said, you might consider quitting while you're behind....so as not to get any "behinder"....
So in other words you can't find where I "attacked you first" so you go off on this tangential spiel to try to extricate yourself from the hole that you've dug for yourself.
I don't see myself getting "behinder" at all.
Back up your claim...show me where I "attacked" you "first".

274 posted on 04/17/2007 7:30:44 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36
Oh, I'm scared now that two whole posters disagree with me. Just what do they claim my "nefarious motives" are?

"Disagree" is probably not the correct word. It appeared more like ridicule to me. But then you seem to be the one who is interested in word construction rather than substance.

And how is that? Simply by stating that a certain movie was good?

No. Nor is it just your inability to objectively look at it and challenge its points, but more because this thread is nothing new to you.

so you go off on this tangential spiel

That you have the gall to use that term with your pathetic attack on nothing more than word construction having absolutely nothing to do with the thread is nothing short of amazing. Though had I listened to those who knew you better, I would have written you off immediately....as a tangential spielmeister!

The faster you run, the behinder you get....

275 posted on 04/17/2007 8:05:10 AM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson