MACVSOG68 to Zon: Posters such as you are a dime a dozen. I see them on threads where their response to a well thought out post was to criticize the failure to use spell check, or some other meaningless error having nothing at all to do with the thread. 111 and 219
In other words you wrote in your 111 post/response to me that my response to your well thought out post* was to do something like criticize your spelling.
MACVSOG68 to philman_36: I think you forgot the part about the response to a well thought out post. Try reading first so you don't look quite so silly. The "dime a dozen" comment still applies. 220
So in your 213 post you criticized philman_36's spelling in his well thought out post. But that's not what you just intended it (the part you underlined) to mean. No. You intended it to mean that your post at 213 was a well thought out post wherein you also criticized philman_36's spelling.
You can't have it both ways. That is sooooo sleazy. EWWWW!!!
Your idea of a well thought out post: Actually, we have someone who can read and write here, and can use a tad of logic. I don't assume simply because you can log into FR that you are in possession of any of those three abilities....to any measurable degree. -- MACVSOG68 65 I don't think that is a well thought out post. Especially since your very next posts at 68 you demonstrated that you didn't know how Alan Keyes got entered into the discussion you were having about the article that Keyes had written. As you put it: How did Keyes get into this discussion? It boggles the mind. A tad of logic would be to use the find function on your browser to see where Alan Keyes entered the discussion. ...Since you missed it the first time when you read the article. (I'm assuming you read the article.)
Neither of you had anything remotely related to the thread. Both of you merely criticize the writing of others. You may have some well thought out posts...somewhere, just not here. I would have to assume that you both are part of this ridiculous tax protester cult who actually believe all of the "unconstitutional" BS, and simply want to try and take aim at anyone who points out the absurdity of the arguments, but who haven't enough knowledge to counter them. Zon, I believe I pointed out your inconsistencies much earlier, but you seem incapable of recognizing them, which in itself is indicative of your age and educational level. You might take the meaning of your tag line seriously. You have been intellectually dishonest from the first post to me until now. You have repeatedly lied about what I said earlier to make it look like something it was not. Honesty?
As I said, the bottom feeders here are a strange lot.