To: MACVSOG68
Your examples are "after the fact" or subsequent laws and generally are not congruent with the original passage.
There's something nice about unadulterated laws, isn't there.
To: philman_36
Your examples are "after the fact" or subsequent laws and generally are not congruent with the original passage. There's something nice about unadulterated laws, isn't there.I'm not sure what we are arguing anymore. I thought the issue was your dislike of laws that "require such and such or else". I think I said all laws in one way or another do that. Even your examples would have laws attached that require such and such or else. That's essentially what a social structure is, for better or worse. I'm still not sure I follow your point as it pertains to this thread.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson