Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush aides' use of GOP e-mail probed [Karl Rove and his deputies......]
Yahoo ^

Posted on 04/11/2007 1:54:42 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Bush aides' use of GOP e-mail probed

By JENNIFER LOVEN, Associated Press Writer 17 minutes ago

Congressional investigators are probing why aides to President Bush used Republican Party-sponsored e-mail accounts to help plan the administration's ouster of eight federal prosecutors.

They are questioning whether the use of nongovernmental e-mail accounts was proof that the firings were political. They also want to know if White House officials are purposely conducting sensitive official presidential business via nongovernmental accounts to get around a law requiring preservation — and eventual disclosure — of presidential records.

The investigators are seeking copies of any e-mails sent from or to these accounts that are related to the dismissal of the U.S. attorneys.

The White House says there's no attempt to hide anything.

The accounts were set up for about 20 Bush aides — such as Karl Rove and his deputies — who get involved in politics, spokesman Scott Stanzel said. Having the Republican National Committee create non-White House addresses and provide separate BlackBerries, laptops and other communications gear was designed to avoid running afoul of Hatch Act rules barring federal employees from engaging in political activities with government resources or on government time, he said.

Under President Clinton, White House aides used separate equipment for political spadework but did not have separate accounts.

"This is entirely appropriate," Stanzel said of the Bush White House practice.

Moreover, he said, all e-mails to and from the accounts have been excluded since 2004 from the Republican National Committee's automatic deletion policy, in which e-mails typically are expunged after 30 days.

The White House has promised to look through its staffers' e-mails for anything relevant to the prosecutors' matter. No matter the domain name, documents will be provided to the Senate and House Judiciary committees

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: collusion; dnctalkingpoints; fishingtrip; karlrove; politicalwitchhunt; rove; usattorney

1 posted on 04/11/2007 1:54:43 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Under President Clinton, White House aides used separate equipment for political spadework but did not have separate accounts.”

And Loven, of course, would know. I wonder how much the Clintons are paying her to write this stuff.


2 posted on 04/11/2007 2:04:45 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

If they are using these accounts to communicate any national security things or even communications between Rove and the President or about the President, it represents a huge security risk IMO. Not too hard for the Chinese or Russians to hack RNC accounts or capture RNC mail I don’t imagine.


3 posted on 04/11/2007 2:25:35 PM PDT by DemEater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Paging Claude Rains.


4 posted on 04/11/2007 2:35:52 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"Under President Clinton, White House aides used separate equipment for political spadework but did not have separate accounts."

Uh folks, why would it be better to use government email accounts to handle political business??

5 posted on 04/11/2007 2:50:34 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

All these stories sound bad if you read the headline real fast, but there is nothing there. All the emails were retained and we all know how easy it is to create and use tons of email accounts.


6 posted on 04/11/2007 2:52:27 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Gee, could a political appointment be political????


7 posted on 04/11/2007 2:53:21 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup ("Is it real? Or is it Reuters?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Under President Clinton, White House aides used separate equipment for political spadework but did not have separate accounts.”

Yeah, someone’s going to have to explain to me how the unaudited “Mail2” server was accidental.


8 posted on 04/11/2007 3:32:41 PM PDT by james500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Jennifer Loven = AP press hack for the Demagogues

Everything she writes looks like a press release from the DNC

I suppose it’s because everything she writes IS basically a presser from the DNC


9 posted on 04/11/2007 4:48:07 PM PDT by Enchante (Liefong, Fitzfong, Earlefong, Schumfong, Waxfong, Pelosifong.... see a pattern here?!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemEater

...was designed to avoid running afoul of Hatch Act rules barring federal employees from engaging in political activities with government resources or on government time....

Gosh — dont ya think that if they are afraid of transgressing the Hatch act, they might be paying fairly close attention to mixing national security and political activities????


10 posted on 04/11/2007 5:36:52 PM PDT by sgtyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The White House has promised to look through its staffers' e-mails for anything relevant to the prosecutors' matter.

Hee...hee.

11 posted on 04/11/2007 5:37:18 PM PDT by mtntop3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemEater

“If they are using these accounts to communicate any national security things or even communications between Rove and the President or about the President, it represents a huge security risk IMO. Not too hard for the Chinese or Russians to hack RNC accounts or capture RNC mail I don’t imagine.”

We used to have a saying in military intelligence that went something like this: “If you throw a top secret technical manual over the Berlin Wall, the Soviets will throw it back five minutes later with the changes posted.”


12 posted on 04/11/2007 6:52:39 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Iran delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Here we go again with the latest non-scandal scandal. It seems that the Dems’ strategy is just to shout “Scandal! Scandal!” and hope that the impression of scandal sticks in the public’s mind, despite the lack of substance to any of these scandals.


13 posted on 04/11/2007 9:22:34 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
"All these stories sound bad if you read the headline real fast, but there is nothing there. All the emails were retained "

The linked article has been updated - the White House is now saying it has "mishandled Republican Party-sponsored e-mail accounts used by nearly two dozen presidential aides, resulting in the loss of an undetermined number of e-mails concerning official White House business."

14 posted on 04/12/2007 6:53:14 AM PDT by Michamilton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Williams
All these stories sound bad if you read the headline real fast, but there is nothing there. All the emails were retained

There is something called the Presidential Records Act. Those emails are the property of the United States Government, and due to the RNC's retention policy prior to 2004, such emails were automatically deleted in violation of the PRA, and users were allowed to delete them, also a violation. I believe White House policy also says that ALL emails must be stored on White House systems to ensure proper archival in accordance with the law.

I guess we didn't learn our lesson from Clinton.

15 posted on 04/12/2007 1:28:54 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Michamilton
resulting in the loss of an undetermined number of e-mails concerning official White House business.

Looks like prima facie evidence of a violation of 44 USC, Chapter 22.

16 posted on 04/12/2007 1:41:19 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson