Hey, I saw your response to me, but I forgot to get back to you. We may disagree on gender pricing, but I certainly can’t argue with your choice of candidate.
No worries about getting back to me.
Politics are like a flying wedge. There is no way in hell that we’re all going to agree on everything, all the time.
I find Republican economic, tax, and trade policies to be quite bad, but it’s not relevant to my voting for Republicans because military and life issues are far more important in my scheme of values. This is the problem with Rudy, in particular: he’s so very bad on the morals issues that nothing he can do elsewhere can compensate.
The others are some kind of blah, but I could vote for McCain (he’s as good as Hunter on military issues, but weak on other issues), or Romney (I don’t really trust him on life issues, but he’s enough of an opportunist that he might be reasonably reliable, and better than Hillary anyway). Fred Thompson is good. He doesn’t have the strong military experience and background Hunter does, but if Thompson ends up being the compromise candidate, I’ll have no trouble voting for him. For now, I’m supporting Hunter.
I think Hunter could really take off if Thompson doesn’t enter the race.