The Sally Field effect seemed to center around to perfectionists finding something in common--chemistry.
Yet I see a lot of white woman/black man couples, but rarely see a white man/black woman.
“They found that a 5-foot-8 man was just as successful in getting dates as a 6-footer if he made more money precisely $146,000 a year more. For a 5-foot-2 man, the number was $277,000.”
I think women tend to view dating only from the money angle.
When a women meets a new man the questions are based around, income, education and car. education and car are indicators of income. Also when they tell their friends of a new man they are dating the questions are based on these very same topics.
Not, does he treat you nice, is he caring, does he love you etc.
It is about the money.
I was recently datng a young lady and she started talking about prenups and that the man should allow for the wife to recieve money in the event of a splitup based on the number of years they spent together, sorta like a bonus plan I guess.
Deal breakers:
1. Man hands
2. Elmer Fudd laugh
3. Used toothbrush that fell in toilet
4. Got dumped by Newman
5. Likes Dockers commercial
Yeah - right. And this will explain Mr Henfner and his three playmate “partners”
I dated then lived with this one girl for many years. When i got laid-off my job wasn’t the only thing I lost.
They found that a 5-foot-8 man was just as successful in getting dates as a 6-footer if he made more money
This must be especially hard to do as the taller guys usually get more promotions and better raises at work than their shorter associates.
Women who indicate they’re concerned about money most likely are actually concerned about being provided for. It’s inherent for women to seek out that security and it’s Biblical. Most men ignore it because it’s inconvenient for them to acknowledge their responsibilities. (REAL men understood this before the feminism movement.)
I Timothy 5:8 - “But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.” (”Infidel” = “unbeliever”, and is written that way in other translations.) If unbelievers won’t spend eternity in Heaven, then people who are WORSE than unbelievers have a pretty tragic eternal future.
(That pesky Bible thing can be so disruptive at times.)
Interesting that some men who criticize women’s lib the loudest are the first to malign women who are honest that financial security and being provided for are important. These men need to pick one principle, and then stick with it. Can’t have it both ways.