1 posted on
04/10/2007 10:25:12 PM PDT by
neverdem
To: neverdem
Liberalism teaches them to be passive and to be victims cowering in fear and they end up dead. Battered women should get a gun to protect themselves. Its the greatest equalizer to the terror of being hunted down by crazed exes. In a nutshell, liberalism kills; conservatism saves lives.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
2 posted on
04/10/2007 10:46:01 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: neverdem
If I had my druthers, restraining orders would read something like this:
The addressee, Mr. John Q. Public, is hereby put on notice that in the event he is killed in the abode of Mrs. Jane R. Public or the grounds immediately surrounding same, the police will be strongly inclined to regard his death as lawful self-defense.
That would do far more to protect women than the present "restraining order" system.
3 posted on
04/10/2007 10:49:50 PM PDT by
supercat
(Sony delenda est.)
To: neverdem
Some restraining orders are more effective than others...
7 posted on
04/11/2007 12:11:40 AM PDT by
Jeff Gordon
(History convinces me that bad government results from too much government. - Thomas Jefferson)
To: neverdem
Universities have a conflict of interest when it comes to protecting women or even young men out alone from rape. If the student body was allowed to protect itself from rape and violence with firearms, the universities would inevitably be losing athletes critical to their financial plan. Follow the money
(not a /Sarc tag, and I don't care how many lemmings flame me)
9 posted on
04/11/2007 3:47:44 PM PDT by
MrEdd
(Always look on the bright side of life.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson