Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: romanesq
You can believe what you choose but being tricked into believing that one is the father hardly makes for a good outcome when that proves fraudulent. Folks here seem perturbed by your lack of concern for such fraudulent situations.

I have no problem holding the mother accountable in cases of fraud and have said so specifically. I'm speaking of the child, not the mother. The child didn't defraud anyone, something the mighty freeper he-man club simply can't cope with. In their desire to punish the mother, the are too anxious to punish anybody. Folks here seem perturbed because they can't seem to read very well.

424 posted on 04/11/2007 7:49:00 AM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do suck seed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies ]


To: HitmanLV

“The child didn’t defraud anyone, something the mighty freeper he-man club simply can’t cope with.”

Raising the issue of the child is superflous as no one would suggest the child is guilty of anything.

That people would question why their “he-man club” status is at question and more importantly for not favoring a state imposed sanction for their non-fathering is.


450 posted on 04/11/2007 9:06:19 AM PDT by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson