Sorry its not. By law, like it or not any child born in wedlock is by law the responsibility of the Husband. When that marriage disolves, the court is involved and whats in the best interest of the child is the pervue of the state.
Frankly there is no honorable decision to make if you are a man, the decision is made for you if you have ANY backbone and morality in your soul at all... clearly since you think there is other options to be had, you are no man.
You said, in part: Sorry its not. By law, like it or not any child born in wedlock is by law the responsibility of the Husband.
***
This is not the law in every state.
Frankly there is no honorable decision to make if you are a man, the decision is made for you if you have ANY backbone and morality in your soul at all... clearly since you think there is other options to be had, you are no man.
What kind of freaking nut job are you?
Only a buffoon would look to the law for moral leadership.
No where did I say or imply that a man should not do what is right.
Never you moron.
The part that slips by your stupid skull that men should behave morally because they want to.
It is this simple, some one should say "Please" and "Thank you" because they mean it, not because some zealot is standing behind them with a horse whip.
Actually more men may contribute more to their children, if they were not answering to the buzzards at the "Friend of the Court" or what ever your local collection agency is. One guy I work with had his support payment upped only because the Judge did not like the way he was dressed. The system is morally bankrupt.
Only a morally bankrupt person such as your self would support such a system, as it dove tails precisely with your value system.