>>Also fraud includes intent. The woman who has another man’s baby maybe had no
>>intent to deceive her husband as to the paternity of the child.
ROTFLOL! She accidentally slept with someone else and then it slipped her mind for oh five years or so.
>>She may simply be wrong. ‘Fraud’ is a legal concept and this dynamic doesn’t
>>necessarily mean fraud.
Yes it does.
There can’t be fraud without the intent to defraud. A woman may sincerely be mistaken about paternity.
Maybe she is a lowlife to slut around, but being wrong doesn’t necessarily mean she is being fraudulent.
Kind of like how Dubya was totally wrong about WMDs, but that doesn’t make him a liar.