[ansel12]

You are posting to a never married, childless, lawyer that has made the thread about himself, and he is throwing around the personal attacks to keep the juices flowing.

When he takes over one of these threads, all you can do is ignore him, or just drop the thread, because his passive aggressive nature is in it’s element and you are only feeding his uglier side.

[George W. Bush]

You are posting to a never married, childless, lawyer that has made the thread about himself, and he is throwing around the personal attacks to keep the juices flowing.

I know. But he's just so repulsive. I'm not taking it for granted that he's a lawyer either. I recall a number of incidents here where lawyers and 'special forces' turned out to be nothing of the sort. But he's not worth the trouble to scan the o

When he takes over one of these threads, all you can do is ignore him, or just drop the thread, because his passive aggressive nature is in it’s element and you are only feeding his uglier side.

It's not the passive-aggressive thing so much as it is "smugly and self-righteously passive-aggressive with socialist judicial supremacy tendencies" that are objectionable.

I would guess he will never be married or have any children. I think some of these views he expresses are part of a whole spiel he uses to pick up ugly liberal women in bars. I can't imagine anyone else would find them appealing or sensible.

[HitmanLV]

You are posting to a never married, childless, lawyer that has made the thread about himself, and he is throwing around the personal attacks to keep the juices flowing.

at least have the courage to ping me to your shallow insights. This thread is not about myself in any way. Indeed, it is GWB who consistently tries to make it about me by looking for a personal animus on my part.

There is no personal animus. If there was, I'd say so, But there isn't, so you're patently wrong.