[George W. Bush]

And nobody is seeking to victimize men. You can't seem to cope with the fact that it's better to harm an adult than it is to harm a child.

You can't even write two sentences without contradicting yourself, your position is so twisted.

You justify victimizing men. Then you somehow try to pretend that it's fine to victimize a man when the child will come to the same exact harm either way once the divorce is granted.

You just like your socialism imposed by a family court. And that makes you a Divorce Troll. Don't bother to deny it, you have a long history of smugly haunting these threads.

[HitmanLV]

You justify victimizing men. Then you somehow try to pretend that it's fine to victimize a man when the child will come to the same exact harm either way once the divorce is granted.

Your attempts to make it personal grow more shrill. The harm isn't exactly the same - in one case the child suffers a broken marriage of their parents, in the other, that is compounded by the loss of a father in their life.

[HitmanLV]

You just like your socialism imposed by a family court. And that makes you a Divorce Troll. Don't bother to deny it, you have a long history of smugly haunting these threads.

What's a divorce troll, and why is it bad?