Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HitmanLV

I think if you asked most people, they would want to know, and want to know as soon as possible. At least then, if the husband decided to be a Father to another man’s baby, it’s a choice that he is making, not one that the mother made for him. After accepting paternal responsibility, though, I do think that he should be treated as the biological dad in child support and custody issues.
Holding non-fathers legally and financially accountable for children that are not theirs, although noble in intent, is violating and wrong. The man in this situation is just as innocent as the child.


137 posted on 04/10/2007 3:07:19 PM PDT by LongElegantLegs (Wake me up when everyone is ready to self-identify as "earthling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: LongElegantLegs
I think if you asked most people, they would want to know, and want to know as soon as possible

Yes, but in fact in most cases this never causes a problem over the course of a life.

And I do think that biodads should be responsible for financial support, too. I don't want to create the impression that I think they should get off scot free.

174 posted on 04/10/2007 3:24:53 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do suck seed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson