Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aetius
Yes, but again there should be a difference between what a man SHOULD do versus what the law MAKES him do.

Sometimes there is, and sometimes there isn't. The law enforces a basic moral conduct built on consensus. That's what the law is. Sometimes, we legally enforce what people should do. Sometimes that's good, sometimes it's less than good. I agree with you.

131 posted on 04/10/2007 3:02:38 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do suck seed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: HitmanLV
Sometimes there is, and sometimes there isn't. The law enforces a basic moral conduct built on consensus. That's what the law is. Sometimes, we legally enforce what people should do. Sometimes that's good, sometimes it's less than good. I agree with you.

There is a logical fallacy to your argument. You calim that you don't want to see a child lose the relationship he/she has with the only father he/she has ever known. But no law can ever force a someone to have a loving relationship with another person. So if a man finds out the child he thoought was his was fathered by another man, no law can prevent him from choosing to end the contact with the child. The only thing that the law can do is force him to pay money. So the law does not protect the child emotionally at all - it just protects the lying mother financially.

Sorry, they abolished slavery about 150 years agon in this county.

149 posted on 04/10/2007 3:13:12 PM PDT by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson