Posted on 04/10/2007 10:09:20 AM PDT by ShadowAce
Microsoft is showing some early signs of success with a version of Windows geared for a technical computing market that Linux dominates today.
Windows Compute Cluster Server (CCS) runs on a group of interconnected computers that collectively tackle calculation chores. These high-performance computing clusters have swept the list of the top 500 supercomputers - but they typically run Linux, not Windows.
When Microsoft released Windows CCS less than a year ago, the company tried to find a new niche in the market rather than go up against Linux directly. The software giant is trying to win over customers with small clusters, often integrated with the work customers are doing on their Windows PCs.
"We think that's fertile ground that nobody else has hoed yet," said Gartner analyst John Enck. "We were pretty skeptical when they came to market with this, but they're doing much better than we anticipated."
Microsoft has had some successes moving from a market in which it's strong into an adjacent market where it's not. For example, Microsoft moved from operating system software to desktop software, and from Windows on PCs to Windows on servers.
Lateral move
That's exactly what happened in the case of the South Florida Water Management District, which is using Windows CCS to power a modest-size five-server cluster that computes water flow to as part of a multibillion-dollar habitat restoration project in the Everglades National Park.
The group also has a much larger Linux cluster, but the group also had Windows-based modeling tools that they moved easily to the cluster, said Akin Owosina, program manager for the district's Interagency Modeling Center.
Another customer is the Virginia Polytechnic Institute, which is running Windows CCS on a 16-server cluster for research in transportation and in cancer-related molecular modelling.
Microsoft gives itself high marks for its results so far. "We acknowledge we have more work to do here, but we've made good progress in the first year," said Shawn Hansen, Microsoft's director of HPC (high-performance computing) marketing. "We've been very pleased with the results and the uptake."
But when it comes to the Linux-dominated cluster market, though, familiarity with Microsoft can be a burden as well as an asset. For example, SGI, a high-performance computing (HPC) specialist with ties to Linux, got a frosty reception on a compute cluster mailing list when it announced support for Windows CCS earlier this year.
When it comes to HPC, Windows is not the incumbent. "The HPC community has been Unix- and Linux-based for decades," said Gartner analyst Carl Claunch. "The university environments in which most have trained are heavily Linux-centric. The domination of Linux in HPC and in clusters is quite strong."
Among technical advantages of Linux clusters is better maturity, better software choices, broader abilities and a proven ability to run at large scale, Claunch said.
New features
Windows CCS isn't Microsoft's last crack at the market, though. It just released Service Pack 1, which is based on Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2. That new version makes it possible to bring up a cluster in one fell swoop rather than installing software on each machine individually.
Windows CCS isn't Microsoft's last crack at the market, though. It just released Service Pack 1, which is based on Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2. That new version makes it possible to bring up a cluster in one fell swoop rather than installing software on each machine individually.
More significant changes will come with CCS version 2, Hansen said, which will be based on the "Longhorn Server" successor to Windows Server 2003. Longhorn Server is due to ship this year, but Hansen declined to say when the CCS revamp will emerge.
Version 2 will feature "simplified development, deployment, operation and integration," Hansen said. Specific improvements will help networking - in particular TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol) software and support for larger networks, he said.
For development, Microsoft touts its Visual Studio programming tools. Version 2 will feature better support for software that executes in parallel on a number of machines, he said. Building that parallelism into software is a decades-old challenge in the computer industry.
Microsoft also has struck partnerships with IBM, Dell, Hewlett-Packard and SGI to make it easier for customers to purchase clusters with software already set up. SGI likes having Windows CCS as an option for customers working on animation, for example.
If something is free, you get what you pay for IMHO.
I’ll stick with Unix/Linux, thanks. No need to mess ‘round with some Fisher-Price alternative.
And which Microsoft front company released this info?
Uh oh!
(sorry - couldn't resist 8^)
Same here. I much prefer a real OS that I can actually use.
Microsoft, open your eyes! Apple has had XGrid with its cluster servers for a while, and they already use the regular client systems. This is simply another case of Microsoft trying to spread to a new market it sucks at using its leverage. It will take years before they actually have a truly competitive product that would sell on its merits, but in the meantime their muscle will get it pushed out.
From a recent interview with the creator of DirectX we find that Microsoft's attitude isn't "How can we make something that people want?" but "How can we force people to adopt this?"
Why is it assumed to be a lie?
It just may surprise you that people actually may like a product that Microsoft offers. I guess if you get all your views from the interweb you would never realize it.
More proof that Linux-worship is a religion with these people. The only other group I have seen so fervent in their beliefs(right or wrong) is liberal democraps.
A’yup. And one that won’t feel compelled to reboot itself (or worse) at random intervals.
Let me just throw this out there: some of you may have the false conception that Linux is somehow done all gratis. The majority of code written is written by employees on company time at places like IBM and HP. Trust me, they expect (and get) a return on their investment.
Pretty cool, you get a cluster of blue screens!
Actually Server 2003 rocks, it’s easy to cluster and its rocks solid.
I’m not seeing someone that has a working parallel cluster redoing it.
Yep. If they weren't, then they wouldn't be doing it.
no, I didnt miss any part- I even included the quote I was referring to.
Why would people give a ‘frosty reception’ to SGI just for having the nerve to make another product that -OMG!- supports MICROSOFT!!!
Look, I am a computer software engineer - I KNOW linux is vastly superior to anything windows makes. I just don’t like the religious zeal some Linux supporters have, and I think it turns off a lot of users from Linux. (They cause people to think it is too technical)
Well let me amend my statement; I believe that there are certainly some Linux zealots out there. I don’t think that lack of caring about SGI’s support is indicative of that.
Besides, I figure that most of the time they turn off users because of the lack of personal hygeine and Star Trek paraphenalia...the zealots are always the ones that define super-nerd!
There's a social side
to everything. Linux nuts
damage Linux by
making Linux seem
the choice of idiots so
smart folks avoid it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.