Posted on 04/09/2007 8:35:35 AM PDT by kellynla
“Who am I talking to here?”
Whomever he/she is he has a large emotional/financial/social stake in whether or not president Bush grants amnesty to the 20,000,000 illegal aliens.
He seems to be an illegal alien himself.
Who else would be so concerned about the outcome? And throw unrelated items into the mix to confuse and cause hesitation. He has gone off on tangents about a variiety of subjects that nobody mentioned, accusing other commentors of saying things that have no basis.
Such overkill in attempting to convince the FReepers here to change established opinions is suspect.
You got that right. Pretty cocky for only being here 4 months. My guess is either a retread or a second user name. Good thing is people aren't taking the bait.
You’re very active on the thread so it wasn’t necessary. ;)
you have mail
Common sense and established practice from the past. But you haven’t been here long enough to know that. *cough, cough*
Hasn't worked for Texas. More importantly, it's the President's constitutional duty to enforce our immigration laws and secure our sovereignty. We shouldn't have to "buy" our sovereignty or law enforcement by voting for the winning candidate.
“Pretty cocky for only being here 4 months. My guess is either a retread or a second user name”
It seems that his parents are illegal aliens
By the way, congrats on your 1 week anniversary.
I wonder if someone could check to see if you’re the banned clawrence....you remind me of him.
Why stop there? Why not just IMPRISON them? Seize their property. Take all their assets. It is called "fascism" and the worst part of it is, you people think you are the vanguards of liberty. You are just another big government republican, except you wanna say "your" part of expanding the fed is for the "good guys."
If this is now the core of the Republican Party, no wonder the people are disgusted with it. I became a conservative because the ideas of LIBERTY, SMALL GOVERNMENT, FREEDOM and INDEPENDENCE were important to me. I don't see any difference between you people and the left. Both of you are drunk on the idea of federalizing what is not the fed's responsibility.
Old line conservatives would have looked FIRST to the markets and then tried to work a solution with them leading the way. This bunch of slack jawed drooling statists who want to have the fed march in and bully businesses are NOT conservatives at all. Like I said, the textbook definition of a person who has NATIONALISM (patriotic, proud of his heritage, believes in national strength...., all good ideas) and STATISM (for using the centralized power of the state to accomplish goals consistent with nationalism) is NOT a conservative at all, but a FASCIST. Don't believe me? Look up the word in the dictionary. If the choice is between you people and the godless perv statists, there really ain't much of a choice. Neither of you believe in freedom at the core.
My God but you people are pathetic sometimes.
"Neener neener neeeeeeee. I have been posting here longer than YOU have, so there" What a load of crap.
Naaaaa....not to worry. I’ve read enough of the gar-bage he’s posted.
I don’t care about the LENGTH of one’s posting history as we all started out on Day 1, nervous as can be...it’s what’s said over & over & over by said poster.
The weirdest part of all this is that the truly bitter haters in this are the ones most convinced that they are the true blue liberty loving patriots, standing in the bloodline of the fathers and convinced they would be lauded and appreciated as they clamor for building a Maginot Line at the Rio Grande and jailing the business owners who didn't do "enough" to make sure the documents presented him were valid. They are both amusing and pathetic in their own way. It never occurred to them that the market might have solutions that work better than law enforcement. I dunno if they are so stupid it just doesn't register with them, or if they are really mirror images of the left...., squawling about this or that abuse of power, but really just clamoring to get their own hands on it because the good guys can bet trusted not to misuse it. Pitiful fools, they do not even realize they are no different than the code pink crew at the core.
Gotcha. I see what you mean.
there are some. But alot of them get shouted down by people whose idea of reading a truly engaging intellectual defense of liberty means reading an Ann Coulter tract. They have no idea what "conservative" means, except that you should "keep the law." The idea that there can be answers OTHER than law enforcement seems to by turns either befuddle them or infuriate them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.