Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freed Britons Say 'Confessions' Coerced
nypost.com ^ | Apr 6, 11:48 PM EDT | TARIQ PANJA

Posted on 04/06/2007 9:25:19 PM PDT by do the dhue

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: yldstrk

Personally, I just hope never to be in that kind of situation.


21 posted on 04/07/2007 1:06:39 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

> I say they were either very poorly trained or big chickens.

You’d do better I’m sure under similar circumstances. /sarc


22 posted on 04/07/2007 1:12:38 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: art_rocks

> Yes, I guess it would have been better if they fought back and all died.

I’m with you.

They lived to fight another day. Nothing wrong with that: Marine Commandos cost a fair wee bit to train and equip. They were on a fool’s errand and were captured. What were they supposed to do? Fight to the finish, with a certain outcome of going down to Davy Jones’ Locker?

Tell a few lies, put up with a few days indignity seems like a much smarter way to fight a way. That’s what they did.


23 posted on 04/07/2007 1:17:08 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue
British sailors and marines freed by Iran said Friday they were blindfolded, isolated in cold stone cells and tricked into fearing execution while being coerced into falsely saying they had entered Iranian waters.

This requires a one-word response: Duh.

The Brits have my prayers for their transition back to the real world from whatever they had to endure.

24 posted on 04/07/2007 1:25:34 AM PDT by GretchenM (What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue

But the worst ordeal by far was when they were forced to wear those cheap suits.


25 posted on 04/07/2007 3:06:04 AM PDT by Majic (Only a true American could be dissatisfied with a country like America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stop_fascism

“It’s pretty hard to die for nothing.

They were out on some stupid UN mission, and then their backup left them out in the cold. There’s plenty of blame to go around, but relatively little belongs to the captives”

This is true. You have to pick your battles. This incident was not worth dieing for.


26 posted on 04/07/2007 3:12:02 AM PDT by Mila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: stop_fascism

Exactly. As well, England is not at war with Iran which would have changed the rules of engagement.


27 posted on 04/07/2007 4:42:41 AM PDT by Peach (Mercy Me. Not banned yet. Too bad. So sad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

you have to admit that their governments response was just as weak as their resistance


28 posted on 04/07/2007 4:53:53 AM PDT by mfnorman (Jack Murtha: a Lee Harvey Oswald type of marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Peach
As well, England is not at war with Iran

England may not be at war with Iran, but Iran most certainly is at war with England.

L

29 posted on 04/07/2007 4:54:01 AM PDT by Lurker (Comparing 'moderate' islam to 'extremist' islam is like comparing small pox to plague.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue

These are soldiers, not civilians!!!! A key difference.

There is no excuse for their behavior. Duty, honor, and country is mandatory to any person who puts the uniform on.

Do not become a soldier if you choose to put your own well-being ahead of your country’s. They did incredible damage to their nation’s reputation.

It sucks, but that’s the way it is.


30 posted on 04/07/2007 4:56:40 AM PDT by Jhensy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

So do our ROE.

However, they were outnumbered and outgunned. It was not possible without certain death.


31 posted on 04/07/2007 5:06:16 AM PDT by UKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mfnorman

How so?

We told the iranians they had to give them back without negotiation.

We threatened to step up the pressure if they didn’t.

We wsent through the UN, the EU and discussed with out NATO allies.

They couldn;t push sanctions because of the corrupt europeans, and we couldn’t have pushed a military response because under the circumstances that would have been insane.


32 posted on 04/07/2007 5:09:00 AM PDT by UKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

I say they were either very poorly trained or big chickens.
*******************************************************************************************************
They only did what one of our presidential candidates did.


33 posted on 04/07/2007 5:12:55 AM PDT by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican
I would say from the picture that was uncropped that most of the Marines maintained their integrity. The young sailors were absolutely not equipped for that situation (something the Brits should immediately rectify).

The real problem lies with the command who allowed them to be in that situation out of sight of the gunship. That man ought to lose his command.

34 posted on 04/07/2007 5:31:05 AM PDT by McGavin999 ("Hard is not Hopeless" General Petraeus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jhensy
There is no excuse for their behavior. Duty, honor, and country is mandatory to any person who puts the uniform on.

Precisely! That is why I am saying these sailors need to be punished as a lesson. Hate it for them. But, we simply cannot have discipline dissolve in the face of threats. Even the threat of death.

We sell our patrimony cheap if we don't toughen up.

35 posted on 04/07/2007 6:04:54 AM PDT by don-o (Fight, fight. fight to drive the GOP to the right!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue

I watched part(couldn’t stand to watch it all) of the Brit standing in front of the chart explaining ‘where we were, etc.

He didn’t appear coerced.

I can understand giving out a false confession but show something that broadcasts that, blank face, crossed finger, key words,inflection in your voice, something.
And the female, there was no excuse for her ‘letters’.


36 posted on 04/07/2007 6:05:18 AM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

He didn’t appear coerced.

Are you accusing our guys of lying?

Are you chossing to believe the iranians over the brits?

Sound like the answer ro both of those in your opinion is yes.


37 posted on 04/07/2007 6:48:29 AM PDT by UKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican

what the iranians did was an act of war and should have been hit with a military response. screw going to the UN and the EU. the iranians gave the west a great opportunity to hit their nuclear facilities and we punted. this whole incident is totally shameful.


38 posted on 04/07/2007 7:07:45 AM PDT by mfnorman (Jack Murtha: a Lee Harvey Oswald type of marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mfnorman

“what the iranians did was an act of war and should have been hit with a military response. screw going to the UN and the EU. the iranians gave the west a great opportunity to hit their nuclear facilities and we punted. this whole incident is totally shameful.”

That’s a quite absurd and dangerous way of thinking.

You ould happily have sacrificed them to achieve an alterior agenda. That’s pretty selfish.

We need to strike Iran, I’m in favour of that, but it must be on our terms, not the iranians. They had control of the situation, any military strike then would have been a disaster.

We were not in a position to do so at the time either, which would have neglected our duty to the brave heroes fighting any war.


39 posted on 04/07/2007 7:14:08 AM PDT by UKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican
I think what is important here is that no response will only encourage another similar situation one day.

If the Britons were to act instead of allow themselves to live to fight another day, this would start to deter the thugs the next time they thought about doing something similar.

If it is not in the British ROE then, they shouldn't be doing this job. And if this is the ROE and they are doing the job, then the Britons (as a Nation) better send a message to the Mullahs and Amadjohad that says, 'taking Britons hostage is a really, really bad idea'.

I volunteered for the military in my younger days. And yes, I was trained to live to fight another day. But I was also trained to follow the ROE. If our ROE told me to engage all threats in this situation, you can bet I would have. Even if it looked ugly.

And, I watched on the Military the other day a story about 30 Marines taking down 120 insurgents in Iraq. So, if the Iranians ever think about doing this to our Troops, my only advice to Amadjihad is that he better bring their Army too.

Cause 15 of our Marines will thump you and thump you good.

Being out numbered and surrounded by the enemy? Heck, that is just part of a Marine and/or Airborne Rangers job.


40 posted on 04/07/2007 7:27:06 AM PDT by do the dhue (DEM ARE RATS!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson